Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis
Published on: December 20, 2024
Metabolomic insights into variable antihistamine responses in allergic rhinitis: unveiling biomarkers for precision
Xiaohong Lyu1,2, Yi Liu3, Hongna Li4
1Department of Allergy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background:
The clinical response to antihistamine therapy exhibits substantial heterogeneity among individuals with allergic rhinitis (AR). While these medications represent a cornerstone in AR management, the molecular basis underlying differential treatment outcomes remains incompletely understood. This investigation sought to delineate specific metabolomic profiles that distinguish between AR patients who demonstrate favorable responses to antihistamine treatment and those who exhibit therapeutic resistance.
Methods:
This investigation encompassed a cohort of 57 patients diagnosed with AR, stratified into antihistamine-effective (n=49) and antihistamine-ineffective (n=8) groups. The study protocol integrated multiple analytical approaches, including clinical phenotyping, serum vitamin D quantification, mRNA expression, and untargeted metabolomic analysis. Metabolomic profiling was conducted using a state-of-the-art liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) platform, enabling comprehensive characterization of the serum metabolome.
Results:
While demographic characteristics and vitamin D levels showed no significant differences between two groups, blood H1R mRNA expression was significantly higher in antihistamine-ineffective patients (P=0.046), and nasal TPSB mRNA expression was elevated (P=0.006). Nineteen metabolites showed significant differences (p<0.05, fold change>2.0, VIP>1.0) between groups. ROC curve analysis identified nine metabolites with high diagnostic potential (AUC>0.70), with Methotrexate (AUC=0.862), Pro-Val-Ala-Glu-Val (AUC=0.804), and TyrMe-Ile-OH (AUC=0.791) showing the strongest discriminatory power. Pathway analysis highlighted the involvement of caffeine metabolism and tryptophan metabolism pathways.
Conclusions:
This study identified distinct metabolomic signatures between antihistamine-effective and antihistamine-ineffective AR patients, providing potential biomarkers for predicting treatment response and new insights into the metabolic mechanisms underlying treatment efficacy in AR.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Upper Respiratory Drugs: First and Second-Generation Antihistamines
Histamine binds to specific receptor sites, known as H1 receptors, on tissue cells, triggering inflammation and swelling. Antihistamines combat these effects by competing with histamine for these receptor sites. By...
Allergic Reactions
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms:
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...

