Update in the clinical utilization of chemoprevention for breast cancer: a narrative review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Razan Mansour1, Mahmoud Abunasser2, Baha' Sharaf2
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Background:
Breast cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, prompts research into chemoprevention strategies. This narrative review explores risk factors, assessment tools, and summarizes the effectiveness and side effects of chemopreventive agents used for breast cancer risk reduction.
Methods:
Published data from major clinical trials, meta-analyses, and data presented at major international conferences that addressed the utilization of tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibitors (AI) and other potential drugs are reviewed. Risk assessments models utilized to assess women's risk of getting breast cancer are discussed, too.
Results:
Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), demonstrated efficacy in reducing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal and premenopausal women. However, it poses several worrisome adverse events. Raloxifene, another SERM, has risk-reducing benefits with a better safety profile compared to tamoxifen. AI, like anastrozole and exemestane, reduced invasive breast cancer with better side effect profile. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody that tackles receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK-RANKL), is promising in preventing breast cancer in healthy carriers of pathogenic BRCA1 variants. Despite their proven efficacy, chemopreventive agents are underutilized underscoring the importance of raising the awareness of health care workers and women at-risk.
Conclusion:
Chemopreventive agents present opportunities for reducing breast cancer risk. However, careful consideration of side effects and individual risk factors are crucial to enhance uptake rate. Further research is needed to compare the effectiveness of SERMs and AI in preventing breast cancer, especially in high-risk populations with pathogenic germline mutations.
More Related Videos
08:57Sample Extraction and Simultaneous Chromatographic Quantitation of Doxorubicin and Mitomycin C Following Drug Combination Delivery in Nanoparticles to Tumor-bearing Mice
Published on: October 5, 2017
10:39Using Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells to Teach Core Biology Concepts: A Simple Lab Module
Published on: June 18, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...