Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
Published on: February 23, 2024
Predictability of tooth derotation with clear aligners and its influencing factors: a retrospective study
Shangyou Wen1, Donger Lin1, Xuechun Yuan1
1Department of Orthodontics, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Introduction:
This study aims to evaluate the predictability of derotation in incisors, canines, and premolars, as well as to determine overtreatment ratios associated with derotation using clear aligners.
Methods:
This study included 461 rotated teeth from 44 patients undergoing Invisalign® (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA) clear aligner treatment. The sample was divided into maxillary and mandibular incisors, canines, and premolars. The occlusal and mid-sagittal planes were constructed, and derotation angles and efficiencies were measured using intraoral scans imported into Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA, 2022). Age, sex, skeletal patterns, derotation direction, anterior spacing, premolar extraction, attachment types, and direction of intermaxillary elastics traction were recorded and analyzed for their correlation with derotation discrepancies. Calibrated predictability values were reevaluated, and the corresponding overtreatment design ratios were determined.
Results:
There was no significant difference in derotation effectiveness across tooth types (P > 0.05). The discrepancy between the predicted and achieved derotation values was significantly correlated with the designed derotation values for maxillary teeth and mandibular incisors (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that age, sex, skeletal patterns, derotation direction, anterior spacing, premolar extraction, attachment types, and direction of intermaxillary elastics traction differentially influenced derotation movements. The suggested overtreatment ratios for maxillary incisors, mandibular incisors, maxillary canines, and maxillary premolars are 27%, 30%, 35%, and 38%, respectively.
Conclusions:
Derotation predictability is primarily influenced by factors such as the magnitude of derotation, available space, derotation direction, intermaxillary elastics traction direction, and the mesiodistal/buccolingual ratio, but not by the type of attachment used.
Related Concept Videos
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...

