Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

The Bioconjugation and Radiosynthesis of 89Zr-DFO-labeled Antibodies
Published on: February 12, 2015
Quantification of 89Zr-immunoPET: Methodological considerations
Philipp Mohr1, Joyce van Sluis1, Adrienne H Brouwers1
1University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Purpose:
Clinical 89Zr-immunoPET relies on semi-quantitative metrics, such as standardised uptake values (SUV) from static imaging at delayed time points. However, SUV can misinterpret target engagement as it ignores plasma and tissue kinetics. Kinetic modelling, common for shorter-lived tracers, is rarely applied to 89Zr-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) due to slow kinetics. This study characterises 89Zr-immunoPET kinetics using a two-tissue compartment model, identifies factors affecting tracer uptake, and assesses the validity of semi-quantitative metrics.
Procedures:
Realistic plasma input functions with different clearance rates, representing variable mAb kinetics and cold mAb doses, were derived from previous studies. Realistic ranges for kinetic rate constants and blood volume fractions were estimated based on literature. Each parameter was varied to assess its effect on 89Zr-immunoPET time-activity curves and Patlak analysis. SUV and target-to-plasma ratios (TPR) at delayed time points were compared with Patlak net irreversible rate of uptake (Ki).
Results:
Fast plasma kinetics resulted in small but specific uptake, while slow kinetics produced higher signals with larger nonspecific contributions. SUV and Ki were driven by tracer delivery (K1) and residualisation upon binding (k3), depending on the scenario. Within groups with limited variations in plasma clearance, semi-quantitative metrics correlated well with Ki. For slow kinetics, where nonspecific uptake contributes more prominently, TPR performed better than SUV. However, despite good agreement in general, linear fits between semi-quantitative metrics and Ki showed notable variability, indicating their limited reliability as surrogates for Ki. Between groups with large differences in plasma clearance, only normalisation by the integral of the plasma input function, as in Patlak analysis, enabled accurate interpretation.
Conclusions:
Patlak analysis accounts for plasma kinetics and reversible signals, enabling more accurate interpretation of 89Zr-immunoPET data than SUV. Wider use of kinetic modelling could enhance quantitative accuracy, support reinterpretation of past studies, and guide future study design.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Positron Emission Tomography
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...

