Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Incidence of Cardiac Arrhythmias Identified by Insertable Cardiac Monitors in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure
Rami Kahwash1, Javed Butler2, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan3
1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Background:
Cardiac bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Insertable cardiac monitors provide a continuous, ambulatory, accurate monitoring strategy for patients with CHF who are not candidates for cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Objectives:
This study aims to assess the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias (CAs) in patients with CHF across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum and not indicated for cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Methods:
Patients with recent heart failure events enrolled in LINQ-HF (Reveal LINQ Heart Failure) and Phase 1 ALLEVIATE-HF (Algorithm Using LINQ Sensors for Evaluation and Treatment of Heart Failure) studies were implanted with an insertable cardiac monitor. All CAs were adjudicated first using an artificial intelligence model, then manually verified, and grouped into 3 categories: atrial fibrillation (AF), ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF), and bradycardia/pauses.
Results:
In total, 163 patients (mean age 67.2 ± 11.2 years, 62.6% male, 49.1% EF ≥50%, 83.4% Class III, 55.2% history of AF) were followed for 17.2 ± 9.8 months. Occurrence of AF was 59.7% at 2 years, 53.1% in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) <50%, and 64.6% in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) ≥50%. Incidence of AF in patients without prior AF was 23.8%, 23.9% in HFrEF, and 27.6% in HFpEF. Incidence of bradycardia or pause was 37.2% overall, (37.5% in HFrEF and 39.8% in HFpEF; 30.3% during daytime vs 19.4% during nighttime). Incidence of VT/VF was 14.3% overall, 19.8% in HFrEF, and 10.4%, in HFpEF.
Conclusions:
In CHF patients undergoing ambulatory, continuous, accurate arrhythmia monitoring, the incidence of AF and bradycardia/pause events was high and similar in HFpEF vs HFrEF patients. VT/VF was lower in HFpEF than HFrEF, but clinically important.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy