Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

09:58
RNAi Trigger Delivery into Anopheles gambiae Pupae
Published on: March 8, 2016
9.2K
Linking Anopheles bionomics and human behaviour in the Lao PDR
Sebastien Marcombe1, Santi Maithaviphet2, Rita Reyburn3
1WHO, World Health Organization, Vientiane, Lao PDR. sebastienmarcombe@gmail.com.
Malaria Journal
|July 3, 2025
Summary
Human and mosquito behaviors in Laos create outdoor malaria transmission gaps. Integrated data reveals limited protection from insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) in certain areas, necessitating targeted interventions.
Area of Science:
- Vector-borne disease control
- Medical entomology
- Public health interventions
Background:
- Laos is working towards malaria elimination by 2030, facing challenges from residual transmission in southern regions.
- Understanding the interplay between long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), vector behavior, human activity, and disease outcomes is crucial for effective malaria control.
- Integrating human behavior observations (HBOs) with entomological and epidemiological data is key to identifying protection gaps and informing national malaria programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of LLINs in relation to human and Anopheles mosquito behavior in Laos.
- To identify gaps in protection against malaria vectors, particularly in outdoor and early evening settings.
- To inform targeted malaria control strategies by integrating entomological and human behavior data.
Main Methods:
- Conducted entomological surveillance of Anopheles mosquitoes and HBOs across villages, cultivation sites, and forests during rainy and dry seasons.
- Collected mosquitoes using indoor and outdoor human landing catches (HLCs) and identified species morphologically.
- Adjusted human biting rates (HBR) with HBO data to quantify spatial-temporal protection and identify gaps, also assessing Anopheles indoor resting rates.
Main Results:
- Collected 1012 Anopheles mosquitoes across 12 species, with higher numbers in cultivation sites than villages or forests.
- Human behavior-adjusted biting rates indicated highest exposure outdoors, especially between 18:00-22:00 and 03:00-06:00 in villages.
- LLINs prevented 42% of total Anopheles bites and 83% of indoor bites in villages, but only reduced outdoor exposure by 26% at cultivation sites.
Conclusions:
- Peridomestic human and Anopheles behaviors in Laos create significant outdoor protection gaps, particularly in the early evening.
- High LLIN coverage is vital for reducing indoor bites in villages, while indoor residual spraying (IRS) may have limited impact.
- Integrating HBOs with entomological data provides critical insights into residual malaria transmission, highlighting the need for innovative, targeted interventions for outdoor and early evening settings.

