Comparative Evaluation of 26-Gauge Needle Versus Kimura Spatula for Corneal Scraping in Infective Keratitis: A

Prafulla Kumar Maharana1, Aafreen Bari, Sohini Mandal

  • 1Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, (P.K.M., A.B., S.S.P., N.H., R.S., T.A., N.S., J.S.T.), New Delhi, Delhi, India; and (S.M.), LVPEI, Bhubaneswar, India.

Eye & Contact Lens
|July 3, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

A 26-gauge needle is a superior tool for corneal scraping compared to a Kimura spatula, offering better sample adequacy and cost-effectiveness for diagnosing microbial keratitis.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Microbiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Microbial keratitis is a major cause of corneal blindness worldwide.
  • Accurate etiological diagnosis through corneal scraping is crucial for effective antibiotic treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of a 26-gauge needle versus a Kimura spatula for corneal scraping.
  • To evaluate sample adequacy, microbiological yield, and safety profiles of both instruments.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, comparative randomized pilot study involved 115 patients.
  • Patients were randomized into two groups: Kimura spatula (n=67) and 26-gauge needle (n=48).
  • Key outcomes included sample adequacy, staining, culture results, and safety.

Main Results:

  • Both instruments demonstrated comparable safety and microbiological yield (P >0.05).
  • The 26-gauge needle group showed a significantly higher number of fully adequate samples (P=0.004).
  • The 26-gauge needle group had fewer non-adequate samples.

Conclusions:

  • Both Kimura spatula and 26-gauge needle are safe and effective for corneal scraping.
  • The 26-gauge needle offers advantages in sample adequacy, cost-effectiveness, availability, and disposability.
  • The 26-gauge needle is a preferred tool for corneal scraping due to its superior performance and practical benefits.

Related Concept Videos