Systemic Mastocytosis in 910 Patients: Prognostic Contribution of the International Consensus Classification in the Context of the Mayo Alliance Prognostic System
- Fnu Aperna 1, Maymona G Abdelmagid 1, Mahesh Kumar 1, Joseph H Butterfield 2, Thanai Pongdee 2, Cecilia Y Arana Yi 3, Mrinal S Patnaik 1, Daniel A Arber 4, Attilio Orazi 5, Dong Chen 6, Kaaren K Reichard 6, Naseema Gangat 1, Animesh Pardanani 1, Ayalew Tefferi 1
- 1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
- 2Allergy and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
- 3Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
- 4Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
- 5Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Texas, USA.
- 6Hematopathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
- 0Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.The International Consensus Classification (ICC) for systemic mastocytosis (SM) offers more accurate prognostic predictions than the WHO-HAEM5 system. ICC classification improves risk stratification by integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular factors for better patient outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pathology
Background
- Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare hematologic neoplasm with variable clinical courses.
- Accurate prognostic classification is crucial for guiding treatment and predicting patient outcomes.
- Existing classifications, such as the World Health Organization-Haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, fifth edition (WHO-HAEM5), have limitations in prognostic accuracy.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the prognostic contribution of the International Consensus Classification (ICC) for SM.
- To compare the prognostic performance of ICC with the WHO-HAEM5 classification.
- To assess the combined prognostic value of ICC and the Mayo Alliance Prognostic System (MAPS) for SM.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 910 patients with SM seen at the Mayo Clinic (1968-2024).
- Categorization of patients based on WHO-HAEM5 and ICC subcategories, including indolent/smoldering SM (ISM/SSM), SM associated with another hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), SM associated with another myeloid neoplasm (SM-AMN), SM associated with lymphoid neoplasm (SM-ALN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL).
- Multivariable analysis incorporating clinical variables (age, anemia, alkaline phosphatase, platelet count) and molecular data (ASXL1, SRSF2, NRAS mutations).
Main Results
- ICC-defined MCL showed significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to SM-AMN (0.08 vs. 2.0 years, p < 0.01).
- ICC-defined SM-AMN had significantly shorter OS than SM-ALN (2.0 vs. 8.1 years, p < 0.01).
- Multivariable analysis confirmed ICC subcategories and MAPS risk variables (age, anemia, alkaline phosphatase, platelet count) as independent prognostic factors.
- Inclusion of mutational data identified ASXL1, SRSF2, and NRAS mutations as significant risk factors, replacing anemia in the model.
Conclusions
- The International Consensus Classification (ICC) provides a more prognostically accurate framework for systemic mastocytosis compared to WHO-HAEM5.
- ICC enhances the prognostic value of morphology in SM risk models.
- Integrating ICC subcategories with clinical and molecular data, including specific mutations, improves risk stratification and prediction of outcomes in SM.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

