Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
Evaluating a Large Language Model's Ability to Synthesize a Health Science Master's Thesis: Case Study
Pål Joranger1, Sara Rivenes Lafontan1, Asgeir Brevik1
1Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4 St. Olavs plass, Oslo, N-0130, Norway, 47 67236520.
Large language models (LLMs) can generate credible master's theses quickly, challenging academic integrity. Universities should consider oral exams to assess genuine student learning and prevent AI-generated work from undermining diplomas.
Area of Science:
- Health Sciences
- Artificial Intelligence
- Academic Integrity
Background:
- Large language models (LLMs) pose a challenge to educational institutions by mimicking academic writing, making it difficult to distinguish student work from AI-generated content.
- The traditional master's thesis, used as proof of higher-level learning, is threatened by LLMs' ability to produce expert-level academic writing.
- The widespread availability of LLMs raises concerns about the trustworthiness of theses in verifying subject comprehension and academic competencies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the quality of machine-generated papers produced by a large language model (LLM) against the standards of a health science master's program.
- To explore the capabilities of LLMs in synthesizing research data and generating academic papers suitable for master's level graduation.
Main Methods:
- An exploratory case study utilized ChatGPT (OpenAI) to generate two research papers simulating qualitative and quantitative health science projects.
- The process involved prompting ChatGPT to synthesize credible datasets and then generate papers, requiring iterative dialogue and prompt optimization.
- Time investment included developing synthetic datasets (1.5 hours for qualitative, 16 hours for quantitative) and generating papers (2.5 hours for qualitative, 3.5 hours for quantitative).
Main Results:
- ChatGPT successfully generated two credible research papers and underlying datasets within a short timeframe, simulating medium-quality master's theses.
- The LLM demonstrated proficiency in synthesizing data, conducting analyses, and producing well-written academic papers that could pass program standards.
- The study highlights the ease and speed with which LLMs can produce academic work comparable to that of master's students.
Conclusions:
- A master's thesis generated by an LLM can no longer be considered definitive proof of a student's extensive study or subject mastery.
- The integrity of academic standards and the value of university diplomas are challenged by the sophisticated output of LLMs.
- Master's programs should prioritize alternative assessment methods, such as oral examinations and school exams, to ensure a rigorous evaluation of higher-order learning.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Master Transcription Regulators
Synthesis and Regulation of Thyroid Hormones
Upon reaching the thyroid gland, TSH stimulates the follicular cells' active uptake of iodide ions from the blood. The ions diffuse to the apical surface of the cells and are oxidized to iodine. The...
Improving Translational Accuracy
Case Studies
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...

