Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Prevalence of bias attributable to composite outcome in clinical trials published in 2019-2020: a systematic review
José Mário Nunes da Silva1, Juliana Ferreira Souza Conceição2, Paula Camila Ramírez3
1Universidade de São Paulo, School of Public Health, Graduate Program in Epidemiology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Insights
Bias attributable to composite outcome (BACO) affects over 25% of clinical trials. Most trials underestimate treatment effects when using composite outcomes that include mortality, highlighting the need for objective interpretation guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
- Medical Research Methodology
Background:
- Composite outcomes in clinical trials can introduce bias.
- Bias attributable to composite outcome (BACO) is a potential issue when mortality is a component.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence of bias attributable to composite outcome (BACO) in clinical trials.
- To assess the impact of BACO on the interpretation of trial results.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of randomized clinical trials published between January 2019 and December 2020.
- Included trials with a binary composite primary outcome containing all-cause mortality.
- Calculated the BACO index to assess the association between composite outcome effects and mortality effects.
Main Results:
- 91 studies were included, with 25.2% exhibiting significant or suggestive BACO.
- In 73.9% of affected studies, BACO indicated an underestimation of the treatment effect.
- No studies showed a significant overestimation of the association due to the composite outcome.
Conclusions:
- A significant proportion of clinical trials using composite outcomes with mortality are affected by BACO.
- The BACO index provides an objective measure to assess bias in composite endpoints.
- Predefined guidelines are necessary for interpreting effects on composite endpoints using criteria like the BACO index.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of bias attributable to composite outcome (BACO) in clinical trials.
Methods:
We searched PubMed for randomized clinical trials where the primary outcome was a binary composite that included all-cause mortality among its components from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. For each trial, the BACO index was calculated to assess the correspondence between effects on the composite outcome and mortality. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021229554).
Results:
After screening 1,076 citations and 171 full-text articles, 91 studies were included from 13 different medical areas. The prevalence of significant or suggestive BACO among the 91 included articles was 25.2% (n=23), including 12 with p<0.005 and 11 with p between 0.005 and <0.05. We observed that in 17 (73.9%) of these 23 studies, the BACO index value was between 0 and <1, indicating an underestimation of the effect. The other six studies showed negative values (26.1%), indicating an inversion of the association with mortality. None of the studies showed significant overestimation of the association attributable to the composite outcome.
Conclusion:
These findings highlight the need to predefine guidelines for interpreting effects on composite endpoints based on objective criteria such as the BACO index.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

