Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
Foot kinematics and running dynamics in children and adolescents with flexible flatfoot
Harald Böhm1, Vivien Schoormann2, Nathalie Alexander3
1HAWK University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Faculty of Engineering and Health, Annastr 25, Göttingen 37075, Germany; Orthopaedic Hospital for Children, Behandlungszentrum Aschau GmbH, Bernauerstr. 18, Aschau i. Chiemgau 83229, Germany.
Background:
Flexible flatfoot (FFF) is prevalent in children and adolescents, often leading to pain and limited sports performance. Running poses unique challenges for individuals with FFF due to altered biomechanics, which may increase discomfort and injury risk. While adult studies highlight running-related foot dynamics, research on children and adolescents with FFF remains limited.
Research Question:
How do running dynamics differ between children and adolescents with FFF and those with normally developed feet (NF), and how does running type (rearfoot vs. forefoot) influence these dynamics?
Methods:
This study included 84 children and adolescents (7-17 years) with FFF and 53 with NF. Participants underwent clinical assessments and instrumented gait analysis, capturing kinematic and kinetic data during barefoot running at self-selected speeds. Analyses examined the relationship between passive ankle dorsiflexion and running type, as well as foot shock absorption during impact and propulsion during push-off. Two-factor ANOVA compared foot conditions and running types.
Results:
FFF participants showed reduced passive ankle dorsiflexion, especially in habitual forefoot runners, with forefoot running less common in the FFF group (31 %) compared to NF (53 %). Forefoot runners exhibited greater rearfoot eversion excursion and velocity, but these differences were not significant between FFF and NF. Rearfoot runners demonstrated higher peak loading rates across both groups. FFF participants also had lower ankle strength, hindfoot inversion velocity at push-off, and generated reduced ankle moments and energy for propulsion compared to NF.
Significance:
This study identifies biomechanical differences in individuals with FFF using a forefoot strike pattern, which may influence loading patterns. Although injury risk was not directly assessed, future research could explore whether improving ankle strength and flexibility may help mitigate potential disadvantages in FFF.
More Related Videos
06:54Clinical-oriented Three-dimensional Gait Analysis Method for Evaluating Gait Disorder
Published on: March 4, 2018
06:35Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running
Published on: September 14, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Ankle Joint
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...