Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025
Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
Step Down From Scheduled Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) Plus As-Needed Fast-Acting Beta-Agonists (FABA) to As-Needed
Ricardo J Estrada-Mendizabal1, John B Hagan1, Alex Wonnaparhown1
1Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz.
Background:
Standard care for stable asthma has been scheduled-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus as-needed fast-acting beta-agonists (FABAs). The efficacy and safety of stepping down from scheduled ICS plus an as-needed FABA compared with as-needed ICS/FABA are unclear.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of stepping down from scheduled ICS plus as-needed FABA compared with as-needed ICS/FABA in patients with stable asthma.
Methods:
We systematically screened MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and WHO ICTRP for randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes between scheduled ICS plus as-needed FABA and stepping down to as-needed ICS/FABA for patients with stable asthma. Random-effects models-synthesized outcomes included severe exacerbations, asthma control, asthma quality of life, lung function (prebronchodilator FEV1% predicted), cumulative ICS dose (milligrams per year), and severe adverse events. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach informed certainty of evidence assessments.
Results:
We included 7 randomized controlled trials (2485 patients). Meta-analysis showed little to no difference between the scheduled and as-needed ICS groups for severe exacerbations (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.17), asthma quality of life (mean difference [MD], -0.11; 95% CI, -0.28 to 0.07), lung function (MD, -1.24; 95% CI, -3.09 to 0.61), and severe adverse events rate (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.43 to 2.95). Asthma control scores favored scheduled ICS (MD, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.22), though the effect was trivial. Cumulative ICS dose was lower with as-needed ICS (MD, -105.36 mg/y; 95% CI, -120.85 to -89.88). On Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations, all outcomes were rated as having moderate certainty of evidence.
Conclusions:
In patients with stable asthma on scheduled ICS and as-needed FABA, stepping down to as-needed ICS/FABA resulted in noninferior asthma control and asthma quality of life with reduced cumulative ICS exposure.
Related Concept Videos
01:26COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
01:25Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
01:30Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
01:25Antiasthma Drugs: β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists
One class of bronchodilators includes β2-adrenoceptor agonists. These agents target the β2-adrenoceptors located on bronchial smooth muscle cells. By stimulating these receptors, β2-agonists induce...
01:20Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
01:30Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...