Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Clinical characteristics analysis of anorectal function changes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal
Pin Wang1, Bixing Ye2, Guoxin Zhang2
1Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China; Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Mei Shan Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Background And Aims:
Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is established for rectal neoplasms, postprocedural anorectal dysfunction (eg, altered bowel habits, urgency, or anal discomfort) remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and temporal recovery patterns of these symptoms.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 296 patients who underwent ESD for rectal lesions from January 2020 to December 2023. Data regarding the ESD procedure and anorectal symptoms were collected, including scores from the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), Wexner Fecal Incontinence Score, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were categorized into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, and a comparative analysis of clinical features was conducted.
Results:
Among 296 patients, 82 (27.7%) experienced anorectal symptoms, primarily characterized by increased bowel movements, anal discomfort, defecation urgency, and loose stools. The LARS, Wexner, SAS, and SDS scores showed a decreasing trend during the 1-week to 12-month postoperative period, whereas the GIQLI score exhibited an increasing trend. Compared with the asymptomatic group, the symptomatic group had significantly higher LARS, Wexner, SAS, and SDS scores and a lower GIQLI score at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively (P < .05). No significant differences in SAS, SDS, and GIQLI scores were observed between the 2 groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P > .05). Multivariate logistic regression identified lesion location and size as significant predictors. Compared with patients with lesions ≤5 cm from the anal verge, those with lesions 5 to 10 cm and >10 cm from the anal verge had significantly reduced risks of postoperative symptoms (OR 0.202, P < .001; OR 0.100, P < .001). Lesions >4 cm from the anal verge were significantly associated with an increased risk of postoperative symptoms (OR 7.259, P = .003).
Conclusions:
The occurrence of anorectal symptoms following rectal ESD is closely related to the location and size of the lesion. The psychological and quality-of-life impairments caused by these symptoms are primarily short-term and can gradually recover over time.
More Related Videos
09:42Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
Published on: August 26, 2014
05:57ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are: