Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus

Evaluating the rectum and anus plays a crucial role in conducting a thorough physical examination of the gastrointestinal system. Although it may be uncomfortable and often embarrassing for the patient, it holds immense diagnostic value, particularly in detecting gastrointestinal diseases and abnormalities. This guide will explain how to perform this assessment using inspection and palpation methods.
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparable Neutralizing Antibody Responses Following JN.1 and KP.2-Based COVID-19 Vaccination Suggest Limited Added Value of Minor Strain Updates: A Multicentre Immunogenicity Study.

Influenza and other respiratory viruses·2026

Same author

Evidence-based decision analysis guiding clinical guidelines for an organized population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2026

Same author

Performance measures for endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative - Update 2025.

Endoscopy·2025

Same author

Time trends in post-polypectomy surveillance guideline adherence: analysis of over 90 000 colonoscopies with polypectomy.

Endoscopy·2025

Same author

Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative - Update 2025.

Endoscopy·2025

Same author

STAndardization of Reports (the STAR project) Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative.

Endoscopy·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Quality parameters of colorectal polypectomy.

Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg¹, Monika Ferlitsch²

¹Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Quality Assurance Working Group, Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vienna, Austria.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology

|July 3, 2025

Summary

High-quality polypectomy is crucial for preventing colorectal cancer and improving patient outcomes. Standardizing techniques and metrics is essential for consistent, effective endoscopic care.

Keywords:

Performance Polypectomy Quality

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity

Published on: August 2, 2024

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity

Published on: August 2, 2024

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

Area of Science:

Gastroenterology
Endoscopic Surgery

Background:

High-quality polypectomy is vital for colorectal cancer prevention and patient outcomes.
Existing quality parameters face implementation challenges due to new techniques and lack of standardization.

Purpose of the Study:

To review key factors influencing polypectomy quality.
To discuss methods for measuring quality and overcoming barriers to implementation.

Main Methods:

Literature review focusing on procedural techniques, resection rates, efficiency, and outcomes.
Discussion of advanced imaging, documentation, training, and guideline adherence.
Exploration of barriers like operator variability and resource limitations.

Main Results:

Procedural techniques, complete resection rates, and efficiency are key quality indicators.
Advanced imaging, documentation, training, and guideline adherence can improve outcomes.
Operator variability and resource constraints are significant barriers.

Conclusions:

Standardized quality metrics and continuous professional development are needed for consistent, high-quality polypectomy.
Addressing barriers is crucial for effective endoscopic care and improved patient outcomes.