Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy01:28

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

335
Capsule endoscopy, or wireless or video capsule endoscopy, is a diagnostic procedure for examining the entire gastrointestinal tract. Patients swallow a capsule about the size of a vitamin tablet. The capsule is equipped with a transmitter, a battery, an LED light source, and a color video camera to capture images throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This procedure is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, tumors, polyps, ulcers,...
335
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

193
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
193
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy01:29

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

358
An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
358
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

179
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
179
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination01:28

Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination

379
Meaning of Cystoscopic Examination:Cystoscopy is an essential diagnostic tool in urology that is used to assess the structure and function of the genitourinary system. It provides a direct view of the urethra, bladder, and, in some cases, the ureteral openings. This procedure helps detect structural abnormalities, infections, cancers, and blockages in the urinary tract. There are two types of cystoscopy:Flexible cystoscopy is commonly performed in outpatient settings due to its less invasive...
379
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP01:26

Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP

962
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic procedure that combines endoscopy and fluoroscopy to diagnose and treat conditions related to the bile ducts, pancreatic ducts, and gallbladder. This procedure is beneficial for identifying and addressing blockages, gallstones, strictures, and tumors within the biliary or pancreatic systems. ERCP is both diagnostic and therapeutic, offering the ability to visualize and treat identified problems in one session.
Patient...
962

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inter-Observer Variability of Gerd-Related Metrics on High-Resolution Manometry and Calculation of the Milan Score.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2026
Same author

<b>Taxonomic revision of the <i>Psylliodes picipes</i> species group (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) with description of a new species from Central Apennines</b>.

Zootaxa·2026
Same author

Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Capsule Endoscopy for Treat-to-Target Monitoring in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·2026
Same author

Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Adolescents and Adults: Real-World Outcomes Across Different Dosing Regimens from the EoE CONNECT Registry.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

A cecal lesion hiding a secret: underwater endoscopic mucosal resection revealed an occult appendiceal neuroendocrine tumor.

Endoscopy·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.0K

How to measure quality in capsule endoscopy.

Daniele Salvi1, Stefania Piccirelli1, Maria Parmigiani1

  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology
|July 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the gold standard for diagnosing small bowel issues, but real-world quality varies. Improving bowel prep and adherence to guidelines is crucial for accurate diagnoses and better patient outcomes.

Keywords:
Mid-gutSmall intestineSmall-bowel

More Related Videos

Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
09:42

Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation

Published on: August 26, 2014

18.8K
A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance
03:54

A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance

Published on: October 19, 2018

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.0K
Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation
09:42

Murine Endoscopy for In Vivo Multimodal Imaging of Carcinogenesis and Assessment of Intestinal Wound Healing and Inflammation

Published on: August 26, 2014

18.8K
A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance
03:54

A New Ex Vivo Model for the Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Injection Material Performance

Published on: October 19, 2018

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Devices
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the leading diagnostic tool for small bowel disorders.
  • Established guidelines aim to standardize SBCE quality, but implementation is inconsistent.
  • Variability in bowel preparation and protocol adherence impacts diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of high-quality SBCE for clinical outcomes.
  • To identify key challenges in real-world SBCE implementation.
  • To suggest future research directions for improving SBCE.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current SBCE guidelines and quality initiatives.
  • Analysis of common challenges in SBCE procedures.
  • Identification of areas for future research and development.

Main Results:

  • Despite its status as the gold standard, many centers do not meet recommended SBCE benchmarks.
  • Inconsistent bowel preparation and management of findings are significant issues.
  • Adherence to timelines, especially post-bleeding, remains a challenge.

Conclusions:

  • Achieving high-quality SBCE is vital for reliable diagnostics and improved patient care.
  • Future research should focus on AI, training, completion rates, and standardized bowel preparation.
  • Addressing implementation gaps is essential for maximizing SBCE's diagnostic potential.