Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

193
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
193
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

149
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
149
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema01:23

Lower GI Series: Barium Enema

509
A Barium Enema, or a lower GI series, is a specialized radiographic examination designed to visualize the lower gastrointestinal tract, specifically the colon and rectum. This procedure is instrumental in diagnosing various conditions such as colorectal cancer, polyps, diverticulosis, and inflammatory bowel disease.
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
509
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy01:28

Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy

335
Capsule endoscopy, or wireless or video capsule endoscopy, is a diagnostic procedure for examining the entire gastrointestinal tract. Patients swallow a capsule about the size of a vitamin tablet. The capsule is equipped with a transmitter, a battery, an LED light source, and a color video camera to capture images throughout the gastrointestinal tract. This procedure is particularly useful for diagnosing conditions such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, tumors, polyps, ulcers,...
335
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

179
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
179
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus01:25

Assessment of the Rectum and Anus

412
Evaluating the rectum and anus plays a crucial role in conducting a thorough physical examination of the gastrointestinal system. Although it may be uncomfortable and often embarrassing for the patient, it holds immense diagnostic value, particularly in detecting gastrointestinal diseases and abnormalities. This guide will explain how to perform this assessment using inspection and palpation methods.
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
412

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic endoscopic resection for assessing potential residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Gut·2026
Same author

Adenoma detection and subsequent colorectal cancer risk: is the race really over?

Gut·2025
Same author

Computer aided detection and diagnosis of polyps in adult patients undergoing colonoscopy: a living clinical practice guideline.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2025
Same author

Multicenter analysis of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastrointestinal lesions in Poland.

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology·2025
Same author

Dysbiosis of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract in Head-and-Neck Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study Using the Capsule Sponge Device.

Cancers·2024
Same author

QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy.

Gut·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

148

Quality in screening colonoscopy.

Aleksandra Sztogrin-Pluta1, Nastazja Dagny Pilonis2

  • 1Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology
|July 3, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Improving colonoscopy quality is crucial to reduce missed lesions and post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (CRC). This review covers key quality indicators and strategies to enhance detection and procedural effectiveness.

Keywords:
Adenoma detection rate (ADR)Colonoscopy quality indicatorsPost-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC)

More Related Videos

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.0K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
03:43

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists

Published on: July 11, 2025

148
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

32.0K
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.4K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Colonoscopy quality is increasingly recognized as vital.
  • Variability in lesion detection and missed lesions contribute to post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (CRC).
  • Standardized quality indicators have been developed to address these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the latest evidence on colonoscopy quality indicators.
  • To discuss their impact on clinical outcomes.
  • To present practical strategies for enhancing detection rates and procedural quality.

Main Methods:

  • Categorization of quality indicators into pre-procedural, intra-procedural, and post-procedural phases.
  • Inclusion of technical, cognitive, and administrative factors.
  • Focus on validated measures like bowel preparation, detection rates, cecal intubation, complications, and surveillance.

Main Results:

  • Quality indicators are essential for minimizing gaps in colonoscopy effectiveness.
  • Key validated measures are emphasized across professional societies.
  • Indicators interact and collectively determine overall procedural success.

Conclusions:

  • Enhancing colonoscopy quality is paramount for patient outcomes.
  • A comprehensive approach to quality indicators is necessary.
  • Practical strategies can improve lesion detection and reduce post-colonoscopy CRC.