Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
Guideline of guidelines: a critical appraisal of the evidence for PSA retesting intervals
Kiana K Collins1, Pradeep S Virdee1, Nia Roberts2
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Objectives:
To summarise the recommendations for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) retesting intervals and to evaluate the evidence cited by each guideline by conducting a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.
Methods:
We searched PubMed and the Turning Research into Practice (TRIP) database for guidelines written in English and developed or updated in 2013-2024. Guideline quality assessment was performed using the AGREE II tool. We narratively synthesised results.
Results:
Eleven guidelines were included. Ten (91%) recommended PSA retesting intervals of approximately 2 to 4 years. A total of 37 studies were referenced as evidence for the recommended intervals across the 11 guidelines. Five of these studies (14%) had the objective of determining PSA retesting intervals. Fourteen studies (38%) analysed single PSA test results. Five guideline recommendations partially aligned with the evidence referenced and five did not align.
Conclusions:
Generally, for asymptomatic patients aged ≥50 years with PSA levels between 1 and 3 ng/mL, most guidance recommended a retesting interval of 2-4 years, with the possibility to extend the interval to 4-10 years for patients with a PSA value <1 ng/mL. Until research generates direct evidence for PSA retesting intervals for both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, clinicians and patients engaging in shared decision-making should be aware that current guidelines lack direct evidence for recommended PSA retesting intervals.
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Reliability and Validity
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

