Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Surgical Closure of Equine Abdomen, Prevention, and Management of Incisional Complications
Published on: May 10, 2024
Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Compared to Conventional Dressing Following Autologous Abdominal Tissue
Lucas Gallo1,2, Patrick Kim1, Emily Dunn1
1Division of Plastic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
This pilot study found that a full randomized controlled trial comparing closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) to conventional dressings for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is feasible. The ciNPT group showed lower wound dehiscence rates.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Surgical Innovation
- Clinical Trial Methodology
Background:
- Equipoise exists regarding the optimal dressing for abdominal incisions in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction.
- Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) is a potential alternative to conventional dressings, but its efficacy in this specific context requires investigation.
- A pilot study is crucial to assess the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ciNPT versus conventional dressings for abdominal incisions in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
- To evaluate primary feasibility outcomes including eligibility, recruitment, and retention rates.
- To explore secondary outcomes such as abdominal site complications and patient-reported quality of life.
Main Methods:
- A parallel, between-group randomized controlled pilot trial conducted at two academic breast reconstruction centers.
- Inclusion criteria: adult female patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction; exclusion criteria: pregnancy, adhesive allergy, BMI ≥40 kg/m².
- Block randomization (1:1) intraoperatively, with outcome assessment by a blinded assessor.
Main Results:
- Feasibility targets were met: eligibility (90.6%), recruitment (86.2%), and retention (95.8% post-randomization).
- Wound dehiscence rates were significantly lower in the ciNPT group (16.7%) compared to the conventional dressing group (41.7%).
- 12 patients were randomized to each group.
Conclusions:
- The full RCT comparing ciNPT to conventional dressings for DIEP flap abdominal incisions is feasible based on the pilot study's outcomes.
- An anticipated sample size of 54 patients per group is required for adequate statistical power in the full trial.
- The full multicenter trial is currently recruiting patients.
More Related Videos
13:35Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
20:33A Case Series of Successful Abdominal Closure Utilizing a Novel Technique Combining a Mechanical Closure System with a Biologic Xenograft that Accelerates Wound Healing
Published on: July 4, 2019