Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Leveraging Turbidity and Thromboelastography for Complementary Clot Characterization
Published on: June 4, 2020
Thromboelastography in COVID-19 patients: An observational study in the South African context
Bavinash Pillay1, Sarah A van Blydenstein1,2, Shahed Omar3,4
1Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Insights
Thromboelastograms show potential as a cost-effective alternative to anti-Xa testing for monitoring low molecular weight heparin in COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to confirm clinical utility.
Area of Science:
- Medical Diagnostics
- Hematology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is linked to increased venous thromboembolism risk.
- Monitoring low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is crucial but often relies on costly and inaccessible anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) tests.
- Thromboelastography offers a potential point-of-care alternative, yet its performance against anti-Xa in COVID-19 patients is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between thromboelastogram parameters and anti-Xa levels in COVID-19 patients receiving LMWH.
- To assess the potential of thromboelastography as a viable alternative to anti-Xa monitoring.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 42 COVID-19 patients receiving LMWH.
- Blood samples analyzed using thromboelastogram (measuring R-time, K-time, and coagulation index) and anti-Xa assays.
- Samples collected at three time points relative to LMWH administration.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant correlations were observed between anti-Xa levels and thromboelastogram parameters.
- Moderate correlation found between anti-Xa and R-time (rs=0.52, p=0.002).
- Low to moderate correlations noted between anti-Xa and thromboelastogram coagulation index (rs=0.43, p=0.014) and K-time (rs=0.35, p=0.049).
Conclusions:
- Thromboelastogram parameters (coagulation index, R-time, K-time) are significantly associated with anti-Xa levels in COVID-19 patients on LMWH.
- Thromboelastography may offer a more accessible and cost-effective monitoring method.
- Further research with larger cohorts and diverse disease profiles is warranted to confirm clinical utility.
Background:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, requiring monitoring of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) via a time-consuming, costly and often unavailable test - anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa). An affordable, rapid point-of-care alternative, the thromboelastogram, is available, but performance comparisons to anti-Xa are lacking.
Objective:
This study evaluated the relationship between anti-Xa and thromboelastogram in patients with COVID-19 receiving LMWH.
Methods:
This was a retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 receiving LMWH at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa, between November 2020 and January 2021. Blood samples tested with thromboelastogram and anti-Xa were drawn at three timepoints (one prior to and two after administration of LMWH). Thromboelastogram parameters comprised reaction time (R-time; onset of testing to the start of clot formation), kinetics time (K-time; start of clot formation until the clot reached 20 mm), and thromboelastogram coagulation index (overall coagulation status of whole blood).
Results:
Forty-two patients with COVID-19 (15 male and 27 female) met the study criteria. There was a statistically significant, low to moderate correlation (Spearman's correlation coefficient [r s 0.43, p = 0.014]) between anti-Xa and thromboelastogram coagulation index. A statistically significant moderate correlation (r s 0.52, p = 0.002) between anti-Xa and R-time, and a statistically significant low correlation (r s 0.35, p = 0.049) between anti-Xa and K-time, were found. All correlations were 48 h post admission.
Conclusion:
Thromboelastogram coagulation index, R-times and K-times had a statistically significant association with anti-Xa levels in patients with COVID-19. Further research is required regarding their clinical utility.
What This Study Adds:
Thromboelastograms may represent a more cost-effective and accessible option to the conventional anti-Xa test in patients receiving LMWH. However, future research with larger sample sizes, varying disease profiles, and severity of illness is required.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction

