Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2025

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Comparative Accuracy Analysis of the In Vitro Activity of Colistin Against Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Non-Fermenters
Mitisha Soni1, Deepti Chaurasia2, Abhijit P Pakhare3
1Microbiology, Mahaveer Institute of Medical Science, Bhopal, IND.
Objectives:
Colistin is a crucial treatment approach for multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacterial infections but its susceptibility testing is challenging for clinical laboratories. Therefore, the study was planned to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) method and the colistin agar test (CAT) in determining colistin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) among MDR non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB). The performance of these methods is compared to the gold standard broth microdilution (BMD) technique, with the goal of identifying reliable, resource-feasible alternatives for routine clinical laboratory use.
Material And Methods:
A total of 74 MDR non-fermenter isolates (37 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 24 Acinetobacter baumannii complex, eight Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, three Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, and two Chryseobacterium indologenes) were tested by BMD in polystyrene microtiter plates. CBDE and CAT were performed and deciphered as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive criteria (M100; 32nd Edition).
Statistical Analysis:
The diagnostic performance characteristics of CBDE and CAT were assessed by comparing them to the gold standard BMD. Agreement statistics, including categorical agreement (CA), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated. Kappa statistics with 95% CI were used to determine the level of agreement.
Results:
CBDE and CAT showed CAs of 90.5% and 85.1%, respectively, with respect to BMD. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CBDE, with reference to BMD, were 88.8%, 91.4%, 85.7%, and 93.4%, respectively, while for CAT, these were 88.8%, 82.9%, 75%, and 92.8%, respectively. Agreement statistics (kappa) for CBDE was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.56 to 1), and for CAT, it was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.46 to 0.97), both indicating substantial agreement. Species-wise stratified analyses for Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter showed that the diagnostic properties and kappa values were better for Pseudomonas species with both CBDE and CAT.
Conclusion:
Various susceptibility testing methods for colistin give diverse results. CBDE can be used as an alternative to BMD for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a constrained resource setting.
More Related Videos
11:28A Reference Broth Microdilution Method for Dalbavancin In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria that Grow Aerobically
Published on: September 9, 2015
08:54Broth Microdilution In Vitro Screening: An Easy and Fast Method to Detect New Antifungal Compounds
Published on: February 14, 2018