Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Public and Healthcare Professional Attitudes Towards Risk-Stratified Bowel Screening: A Qualitative Study Using an
Hannah Miles1, Una Macleod1, David Weller2
1Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Public and healthcare professionals find risk-based bowel cancer screening acceptable if it enhances current offers without reducing screening for low-risk individuals. Clear communication is vital for successful implementation.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Cancer Screening
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is established, with growing interest in risk-based approaches for improved efficiency and effectiveness.
- This UK qualitative study investigated public and healthcare professional (HCP) views on risk-based bowel cancer screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore public and HCP attitudes towards implementing risk-based bowel cancer screening in the UK.
- To identify potential barriers and facilitators to adopting risk-stratified screening strategies.
Main Methods:
- Five virtual focus groups conducted with the public (aged 60-74 in England, 50-74 in Scotland) and HCPs (n=12 public, n=11 HCPs).
- Discussions facilitated by a co-created info-comic book detailing bowel cancer risk factors.
- Qualitative data analyzed thematically following transcription.
Main Results:
- Consensus exists that higher-risk individuals warrant more intensive screening, but lower-risk individuals should not receive less screening.
- Concerns were raised about potential disadvantage to low-risk individuals if risk factors are overemphasized.
- A desire for streamlined UK-wide bowel screening and clear communication regarding any changes to the equitable current program.
Conclusions:
- Any modifications to bowel screening programs should augment, not diminish, the current screening provision for all risk levels.
- Public and HCP acceptance is crucial; unacceptable changes risk reduced screening uptake and potentially exacerbate health inequities.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Health Literacy
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

