Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Five-Factor Theory of Personality01:29

Five-Factor Theory of Personality

1.2K
The five-factor model, often called the Big Five personality traits, is widely accepted in psychology as a comprehensive framework for understanding personality. These five traits — Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism — are often remembered using the acronym OCEAN.
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
1.2K
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

458
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
458
Cattell's 16 Personality Factors01:24

Cattell's 16 Personality Factors

1.3K
Raymond Cattell's trait theory offers a structured framework for understanding personality by distinguishing between two critical traits: surface and source traits. Surface traits are observable patterns of behavior, such as indecisiveness, anxiety, and irrational fears. These traits are less stable, varying across situations and over time. This means that they are less helpful in understanding the deeper aspects of an individual's personality.
In contrast, source traits are the...
1.3K
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

445
Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished.
445
Cultural Influences on Personality01:26

Cultural Influences on Personality

355
Individualist and collectivist cultures emphasize different core values, shaping personality in distinct ways. In individualist cultures, such as those in the United States, England, and Australia, people prioritize independence, competition, and personal achievement. These societies tend to promote self-focused traits, with individuals often reporting higher levels of self-esteem. In contrast, collectivist cultures, commonly found in regions like Asia, Africa, and South America, emphasize...
355
Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck01:29

Personality Theory by Eysenck and Eysenck

678
Hans and Sybil Eysenck developed a widely recognized theory of personality, which emphasizes the role of temperament and genetically based differences in shaping individual traits. Their theory posits that biological factors primarily determine personality and can be understood through two main dimensions: extroversion/introversion and neuroticism/stability.
In the extroversion/introversion dimension, highly extroverted people are sociable, outgoing, and easily connect with others. In contrast,...
678

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seeing the World Through a Dark Lens: The Dark Core of Personality and Its Relation to Primal World Beliefs.

Journal of personality·2026
Same author

Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive ("dark") personality traits.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Aversive societal conditions explain differences in "dark" personality across countries and US states.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Cheat, cheat, repeat: On the consistency of dishonest behavior in structurally comparable situations.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same author

Basic personality and actual criminal convictions.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Disentangling the shared and unique aspects of clinical and subclinical socially aversive traits relevant for interpersonal personality dysfunction.

Personality disorders·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

93.8K

Four big problems of big five agreeableness.

Benjamin E Hilbig1, Morten Moshagen2

  • 1RPTU University Kaiserslautern-Landau, Germany.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|July 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The Big Five Agreeableness (B5A) trait inadequately measures pro-social behaviors. Alternative models like HEXACO and the dark factor of personality offer better predictions, addressing B5A

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Personality Science
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • The Big Five Agreeableness (B5A) construct is widely used but has limitations.
  • Existing measures of B5A often fail to capture crucial pro-social and ethical behaviors.
  • There is a need for more comprehensive personality models that better explain behavioral variance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the limitations of the Big Five Agreeableness construct.
  • To explore alternative personality models that address the shortcomings of B5A.
  • To propose solutions for improving the measurement and utility of Agreeableness.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and theoretical analysis of personality models.
  • Comparative analysis of Big Five Agreeableness with HEXACO and the dark factor of personality.

More Related Videos

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.5K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

93.8K
Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes
08:43

Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes

Published on: August 29, 2016

10.5K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
  • Examination of measurement discrepancies and their implications (jingle-fallacies).
  • Main Results:

    • B5A insufficiently accounts for pro-sociality and ethicality-related behaviors and outcomes.
    • The HEXACO model, particularly Honesty-Humility, and the dark factor of personality better explain these gaps.
    • Significant discrepancies exist between different operationalizations of B5A, leading to measurement confusion.

    Conclusions:

    • The current conceptualization and measurement of Big Five Agreeableness require substantial revision.
    • Alternative personality frameworks offer more robust explanations for key behavioral domains.
    • Revising B5A is crucial for advancing personality science and its applications.