Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence
Published on: March 9, 2015
Methodological requirements to publish results obtained using high-risk forensic methods in FSI
1Netherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, P.O. Box 24044, 2497GB The Hague, the Netherlands; University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, P.O. Box 217, 7522NB Enschede, the Netherlands.
Abstract:
This editorial provides guidance on what is required for publication in Forensic Science International, particularly regarding methods for detecting deception. The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU-AI act) labels these methods as high-risk. The editorial discusses the importance of addressing ethical concerns and ensuring that the outcomes of such research do not compromise fundamental rights or the integrity of science. The editorial highlights that submissions analyzing biometric features using machine learning algorithms have been rejected, but there is no fundamental reason for this to always be the case. To assist authors in successfully developing and publishing their work on high-risk methods, the editorial provides guidance on what is required for publication in Forensic Science International, including experimental setup, scientific methodology and ethical aspects. The EU-AI Act emphasizes the need to consider both benefits and potential risks associated with using high-risk methods in research. By addressing these ethical concerns, we can ensure that the outcomes are beneficial and do not compromise human rights or science integrity. The editorial encourages authors to address these issues and provides references for further information on related topics. In summary, this editorial serves as a guide for researchers aiming to publish their work on high-risk methods in Forensic Science International, highlighting the importance of addressing ethical concerns and ensuring that research outcomes are beneficial and do not compromise fundamental rights or the integrity of science.

