Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

990
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
990
Health Literacy01:21

Health Literacy

4.2K
Health literacy is an individual's or a community's capacity to comprehend, receive, read, and use relevant healthcare information and services. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2018) defines health literacy as the cognitive and social skills that determine the ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. As a result, the WHO helps individuals manage long-term health concerns, participate in preventative...
4.2K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

81.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
81.9K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

893
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
893
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How patient-centered communication shapes online health information seeking across different channels: The mediating role of uncertainty management.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same author

Motivational Drivers for Teachers as Informal Health Educators to Initiate In-Class Discussions With Adolescents About Smoking: Moderated Mediation Study Using Attribution Theory.

JMIR pediatrics and parenting·2026
Same author

Effect of social and digital media mental health messaging on mental health help-seeking behaviors in the sub-Saharan African population: A systematic review protocol.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Clinical experience and perception of risk affect the acceptance and trust of using AI in medicine.

Frontiers in digital health·2025
Same author

Do Parental Communication and Monitoring Counteract Substance Use in Adolescents? A Scoping Review of Dyadic Studies.

Health communication·2025
Same author

Parent-Child Mutual Influences on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Behaviors: Actor-Partner Analysis.

JMIR pediatrics and parenting·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Understanding health knowledge failures: uncertainty versus misinformation.

Peter J Schulz1,2,3, Kent Nakamoto4

  • 1University of Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland. schulzp@usi.ch.

Scientific Reports
|July 4, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Distinguishing between being uninformed and misinformed is crucial for understanding health literacy. This distinction impacts communication, decisions, and vaccination behaviors, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.

Keywords:
Health literacyMisinformationVaccination hesitancy

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

587
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

587
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Communication
  • Psychology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Health literacy studies often focus solely on correct answers, overlooking the nuances of incorrect responses.
  • Wrong answers in knowledge assessments are typically treated as failures without further analysis.
  • Existing research does not differentiate between uncertainty and misinformation in knowledge gaps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To differentiate between two types of knowledge failure: being uninformed (uncertainty) and being misinformed (holding false beliefs).
  • To develop a measure to distinguish between uncertainty and misinformation based on incorrect answers.
  • To examine the distinct effects of misinformation versus uncertainty on health-related attitudes and behaviors, specifically vaccination.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel measure to categorize incorrect answers as stemming from uncertainty or misinformation.
  • Conducted a survey of a representative sample of Swiss adults.
  • Analyzed the relationship between knowledge failure types (uninformed vs. misinformed), objective knowledge, and vaccination attitudes, recommendations, and uptake.

Main Results:

  • The uninformed group was more likely than the misinformed group to have positive vaccination beliefs and attitudes.
  • Uninformed individuals were more likely to recommend vaccinations to others and report higher vaccination rates.
  • The effects of uncertainty and misinformation were distinct from objective knowledge levels, identifying the misinformed as a unique group.

Conclusions:

  • Distinguishing between being uninformed and misinformed is critical for understanding health literacy and its consequences.
  • The misinformed represent a distinct group whose beliefs and behaviors differ significantly from the uninformed.
  • Future interventions should consider the specific nature of knowledge failure (uncertainty vs. misinformation) to improve consumer judgment, decision-making, and welfare, particularly in public health contexts like vaccination.