Activity tracking devices in pregnancy: Understanding the participant experience in a longitudinal birth cohort

Ashley Redding1, Dionne Coates1, Andrea E Cassidy-Bushrow1,2

  • 1Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.

Insights

Pregnant individuals found Fitbit devices usable for tracking physical activity (PA). Key barriers to compliance included app issues and busy schedules, with a preference for receiving PA guidance from healthcare providers.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Digital Health

Background:

  • Understanding physical activity (PA) during pregnancy is crucial for developing effective interventions and enhancing prenatal care quality.
  • The Research Enterprise to Advance Children's Health (REACH) study, specifically the REACH-Fitbit sub-study, aimed to explore the use of activity monitoring devices during pregnancy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess pregnant individuals' experiences with activity monitoring devices.
  • To identify best practices for delivering physical activity information to pregnant individuals.
  • To understand participant adherence to study protocols and factors influencing it.

Main Methods:

  • Focus groups were conducted with participants of the REACH-Fitbit study who were pregnant and using an activity monitoring device.
  • A semi-structured moderator guide facilitated discussions on device usability, protocol compliance, and preferred methods for receiving PA information.
  • Virtual focus groups captured feedback on overall participant experience, adherence challenges, and dissemination of PA knowledge.

Main Results:

  • Most participants, identifying as Black and aged 20-29, reported positive experiences and found the Fitbit usable and functional.
  • Compliance with study protocols was supported by text reminders and research staff, but hindered by app problems, busy schedules, and forgetfulness.
  • A majority (57%) did not receive PA information during prenatal care, yet participants desired guidance on safe types and amounts of exercise during pregnancy, preferring healthcare providers as a source.

Conclusions:

  • Findings can inform future studies and interventions using similar technology, emphasizing the importance of incentives and clear communication for compliance.
  • Enhanced participant engagement can be achieved through improved communication with research teams and addressing technological barriers.
  • Future research should focus on bridging the gap between pregnant individuals' PA information needs and clinical care delivery, improving how healthcare providers share this guidance.
Abstract