A Bayesian Maximum Entropy Fusion model for enhanced prediction and risk assessment of fluoride and arsenic
Jiang Zhang1, Changlai Xiao1, Xiujuan Liang1
1Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China; National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-Situ Conversion, Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Changchun 130021, China.
Abstract:
In the central and western regions of Jilin Province, excessive groundwater extraction has resulted in elevated levels of fluoride (F-) and arsenic (As) in drinking water. Prolonged exposure to these contaminants is linked to endemic health issues, including dental and skeletal fluorosis as well as chronic arsenic poisoning, posing significant risks to both environmental integrity and public health. Since traditional models lack prediction accuracy, this study aimed to construct a Bayesian Maximum Entropy Fusion (BMEF) integrating hard and soft data for improved prediction of F- and As concentrations and probabilistic estimations of contamination risk. This was accomplished by combining the spatial heterogeneity modeling of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), the probabilistic forecasting strength of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and the uncertainty quantification framework of Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME). The BMEF model provided predictions of F- with improvements in accuracy (R2) over GWR, GPR, and BME of 60.8 %, 112 %, and 26.9 %, respectively; improvements in As prediction were 456 %, 84.4 %, and 58.5 %, respectively. The model was able to identify high-risk F- zones spanning 3208 km2, 3650 km2, and 5240 km2 at 95 %, 90 %, and 75 % confidence levels, respectively; those for As were 3884 km2, 4573 km2, and 6490 km2. The model effectively addressed the limitations of individual models in prediction accuracy and uncertainty quantification by integrating water quality sampling data with regression-based predictions. However, it faced challenges such as high computational complexity, sensitivity to data quality, and a lack of consideration for temporal variability.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
The Availability Heuristic
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...
Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy


