Practical Approaches for Seborrheic Keratosis Treatment: Curettage Versus 532-nm Lithium Borate Laser Versus...

Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is the most prevalent benign skin tumor associated with aging, posing esthetic concerns and potential discomfort. The rising demand for cosmetic interventions prompts the exploration of effective removal methods. This study compares three treatment modalities: curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy.

A prospective interventional clinical study was conducted with 30 subjects, treating 123 SK using curettage, 532 nm laser, and propane-butane cryotherapy. Randomized allocation and evaluations at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks were employed. Objective measures included clearance rates (assessed by a dermatologist) and blinded cosmetic ratings by 125 observers. Subjective outcomes encompassed patient-reported pain (VAS), side effects, satisfaction, and preferences.

Curettage achieved the highest clearance rate (87.5% vs. laser: 55%, cryotherapy: 50%; p < 0.01). However, patients perceived complete healing most frequently with laser (90% vs. curettage: 87%, cryotherapy: 53%). Despite lower efficacy, 67% favored laser for future treatments, valuing minimal bleeding and no dressings. Observers rated curettage's cosmetic outcomes superior (50% vs. laser: 22.5%). Laser caused the fewest side effects (mean 0.93/lesion) but highest pain (VAS: 4.62 vs. cryotherapy: 3.85). Cryotherapy showed efficacy comparable to laser (50% vs. 55%) but more adverse events.

Curettage remains optimal for thick, hyperkeratotic SKs, enabling histopathological confirmation. The 532 nm laser, preferred subjectively for convenience, may suit small, non-hyperkeratotic lesions but warrants further validation. Propane-butane cryotherapy offers a cost-effective alternative. The discordance between patient preferences (prioritizing convenience) and clinical efficacy underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies balancing outcomes, tolerability, and cosmetic expectations.