Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Expanding Interventional Pulmonology Research with Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy
Published on: July 19, 2024
Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Needle Biopsy Which Needle for Which Patient: A Prospective Randomized Study
Emre Çelik1, Muzaffer Metintaş1,2, Güntülü Ak1,2
1Department of Chest Diseases, Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Ultrasound-guided Abrams needle biopsy (US-ANPB) offers superior diagnostic accuracy and safety for pleural effusions compared to cutting needle biopsy (US-CNPB). US-CNPB is recommended for thicker effusions (≥ 1 cm), while US-ANPB is preferred for thinner effusions (< 1 cm) when medical thoracoscopy is unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Pulmonology
- Interventional Radiology
- Diagnostic Pathology
Background:
- Increasing incidence of pleural effusions necessitates effective diagnostic methods.
- Limited availability of medical thoracoscopy (MT) drives the adoption of ultrasound (US)-guided pleural needle biopsies.
- US-guided biopsies using Abrams or cutting needles are crucial for histopathological diagnosis of pleural diseases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of US-guided Abrams and cutting needles.
- To determine the optimal needle type for specific clinical scenarios in diagnosing pleural effusions.
- To compare the efficacy of US-guided cutting needle biopsy (US-CNPB) versus US-guided Abrams needle biopsy (US-ANPB).
Main Methods:
- A prospective randomized study involving 174 patients with undiagnosed pleural effusion.
- Patients were randomized into two groups: US-guided cutting needle biopsy (US-CNPB) and US-guided Abrams needle biopsy (US-ANPB).
- Diagnostic yield, accuracy, and safety (including complication rates) were assessed for both needle types.
Main Results:
- US-ANPB demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (78.7%) and lower false-negative rates (21.3%) compared to US-CNPB (63.0% accuracy, 36.9% false-negative).
- For pleural thickening < 1 cm, US-ANPB showed superior diagnostic accuracy (77.3%) and safety (no major bleeding) versus US-CNPB (55.2% accuracy, 6.9% bleeding events).
- For pleural thickening ≥ 1 cm, both methods achieved high diagnostic accuracy (US-CNPB: 93.3%, US-ANPB: 88.9%) with no significant difference.
Conclusions:
- US-CNPB is preferred for pleural effusions with thickening ≥ 1 cm.
- Medical thoracoscopy (MT) is recommended for effusions with thickening < 1 cm or without visible thickening.
- In the absence of MT, US-ANPB is the preferred alternative due to its higher diagnostic accuracy and safety profile for pleural effusion diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Studies I: Bronchoscopy and Thoracoscopy
Bronchoscopy
Description
Bronchoscopy is a procedure that involves direct visualization of the larynx, trachea, and bronchi for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. A flexible fiber optic or rigid bronchoscope is used to carry out the procedure. The fiber-optic bronchoscope is more frequently used due...
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...

