Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

10:50
A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth
Published on: April 8, 2020
9.8K
Finite Element Method (FEM) Analysis of Dentoskeletal Changes on Temporary Anchorage Device (TAD)-Assisted Mandibular
Nazleen Valerie Vas1, Navaneethan Ramasamy1, Sruthi Harikrishnan1
1SIMATS Deemed University, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Chennai, India.
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
|July 7, 2025
Summary
Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) combined with Class II elastics cause significant skeletal displacement and stress, leading to more substantial skeletal changes than dental alterations in growing Class II patients.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Craniofacial Biology
Background:
- Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) improve fixed functional appliance (FFA) efficiency for malocclusion treatment.
- TADs offer stable anchorage, enhancing skeletal and dental corrections.
- They prevent common FFA side effects like incisor proclination and molar distalization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze displacement and stress patterns in craniofacial structures and dentition.
- To evaluate the effects of conjoined implants and intermaxillary elastics for growth modification.
- Focus on growing Class II patients undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Main Methods:
- Finite element analysis using cone-beam computed tomography data.
- 3D modeling and assembly of mini-implants and miniplates.
- Application of orthopedic force via Class II elastics to simulate treatment.
Main Results:
- Highest stress observed on the mandibular ramus and lateral to the nasal aperture in the maxilla.
- Significant stress concentrations posterior to the glenoid fossa.
- Mandible displaced anteroinferiorly; maxilla displaced posterosuperiorly; dental movements included maxillary expansion and mandibular anterior displacement.
Conclusions:
- Class II elastics with TADs generate greater stress and displacement in skeletal structures than in dentition.
- This combined approach favors substantial skeletal changes over dental alterations.
- Effective for growth modification in Class II malocclusions.
Keywords:
Anchorage devicesClass IIbiomechanicsbone remodelingdisplacementsretrognathic mandibletemporary anchorage devices
