Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Striking a balance: Stakeholder perceptions of risk in horse racing
Jessie McCarthy1, Heather A Cameron-Whytock2, Euan D Bennet1
1School of Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Background:
Thoroughbred racing is a major industry, and in recent years public concerns about equine safety have become more prominent, particularly in relation to on-track injuries and fatalities. This has challenged the industry's social licence to operate (SLO).
Objectives:
To investigate and elucidate how United Kingdom and Irish racing stakeholders perceive risks to racehorses on race day and how those risks should be managed.
Study Design:
Qualitative analysis of stakeholder perspectives using a constructionist approach.
Methods:
Twelve stakeholders from veterinary, communication, and regulatory sectors within racing in the United Kingdom and Ireland were interviewed. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results:
Three key themes were developed 'Managing Risk, or Managing the Message?', 'The Balance between Tradition and Progress on Reducing Risks', and 'Attributing Responsibility and the Public Disconnect'. Participants framed risk according to public misunderstanding and effective communication, while others placed increased emphasis on welfare risks and proactive mitigation measures. Some participants viewed 'accidents' as unavoidable, others believed that more could be done to minimise avoidable risk. Attribution of responsibility was directed towards various industry stakeholders including trainers, jockeys, regulators and the public. Interviewees noted the industry to be rooted in tradition and slow to adapt to changing expectations.
Main Limitations:
Familiarity between the interviewing researcher and some participants may have encouraged open discussion but could have influenced how responses were framed.
Conclusions:
Stakeholders framed risk in ways shaped by public expectations, culture, tradition, and lived experience. There is shared concern for equine welfare and a desire for improved safety measures in conjunction with the management of public perceptions. For a sustainable future, internal divisions must be resolved, shared goals established, and proactive engagement with science pursued to safeguard equine welfare and sustain public support.
More Related Videos
07:31Development of an in vitro model system for studying the interaction of Equus caballus IgE with its high-affinity receptor FcεRI
Published on: November 1, 2014
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Framing Effects
Relative Risk
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Odds Ratio