Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Point-of-Care Hemoglobin Estimation Method for Anemia Management
Published on: January 19, 2024
Can health information and decision aids decrease inequity in health care? A systematic review
Christin Ellermann1, Jana Sophie Hinneburg1,2, Christoph Wilhelm1
1Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Objectives:
A systematic review of studies evaluating evidence-based health information (EBHI) and patient decision aids (PtDAs) was conducted in order to ascertain the extent to which inequity-producing factors have been considered, and in how far people from different sociodemographic groups benefit equally from them in terms of informed decision-making.
Design:
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Data Sources:
Systematic searches were performed in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PMC, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC and PSYNDEX from inception to May 2023.
Eligibility Criteria:
RCTs of EBHI and PtDAs that take into account factors associated with unequal opportunities as defined by PROGRESS-Plus.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
Information on the effect of these factors was extracted and analysed in terms of outcomes relevant to the decision-making process.
Results:
Few studies have examined the impact of EBHI/PtDAs on outcomes relevant to informed decision-making with respect to inequity-producing factors. In our final synthesis, 12 studies were included. A positive association between the effectiveness of the intervention and the disadvantaged status could be found two times and a negative association in three studies. Overall, most of the studies found no difference in knowledge gain, decision conflict and shared decision-making between those advantaged and disadvantaged in terms of ethnicity, gender, education, age, income, health literacy, numeracy or socioeconomic status. However, few trials examined this effect and the effect was considered solely in subgroup analyses that were probably underpowered, so asymmetries between these groups may not have been detected in the existing designs.
Conclusion:
EBHI and PtDAs have been shown to be effective in promoting decision-making and thus in improving healthcare. To improve healthcare equitably, greater attention needs to be paid to methodological requirements in evaluations to fully capture potential differences in access to health-related information between individuals or in populations within the target groups of EBHI/PtDAs.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42018103456.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Integrated Healthcare System
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes: