Outcomes in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction Following Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement
Michael N Zarrella1, Carolina Borz-Baba1, Dorothy Wakefield2
1Internal Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Waterbury, USA.
Insights
Patients with heart failure who improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) after cardiac device implantation show reduced hospitalizations. Lower brain natriuretic peptide levels predict better outcomes and decreased mortality in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Limited data exist on outcomes for heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) post-cardiac device implantation (ICD/CRT).
- This study uses the 2022 AHA/ACC definition of HFimpEF to assess contemporary outcomes.
- Focus on non-tertiary hospital settings for device implantation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate hospitalization and mortality rates in patients with HFimpEF after ICD or CRT implantation.
- To compare outcomes between HFimpEF and persistent heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) populations.
- To identify predictors of improved ejection fraction and mortality.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 54 patients receiving ICD or CRT for primary prevention (2019-2022).
- Ejection fraction (EF) improvement assessed via echocardiogram ≥6 months post-implantation.
- Outcomes measured: 1-year and overall hospitalization/mortality rates; brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels.
Main Results:
- HFimpEF patients had significantly lower 1-year (22.2% vs. 48.2%) and overall (59.3% vs. 85.19%) hospitalization rates compared to HFrEF.
- Heart failure was the primary cause (50%) of cardiac-related hospitalizations.
- Lower BNP levels predicted improved EF (p < 0.01) and decreased mortality (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Patients achieving myocardial recovery (HFimpEF) post-ICD/CRT have better prognoses than those with persistent HFrEF.
- Uncontrolled heart failure remains a key driver of hospitalization.
- Standardized outpatient summaries with scheduled BNP assessment may improve HFimpEF care cost-effectively.
Abstract:
Background Limited data exist on outcomes in heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) following implantation of cardiac devices, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In this contemporary analysis, we utilize the most current American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) 2022 definition of HFimpEF to evaluate hospitalization and mortality in this population. Methods This retrospective study analyzed patients who received ICD or CRT for primary prevention at a non-tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2022. Data were extracted from the Device Implant Registry, assessing demographics, clinical parameters, echocardiography, and device type. Improvement in ejection fraction (EF) was assessed using a follow-up echocardiogram performed at least six months after device implantation. The outcomes measured included the one-year and overall (3.6 years) rates of hospitalization and mortality from the date of ICD/CRT insertion to October 1, 2024. Results Our study comprised 54 patients with a repeat echocardiogram after at least six months post-ICD/CRT placement to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). Those with HFimpEF had fewer one-year admissions (22.2%) compared to those with persistent heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF) (48.2%) (p < 0.05). Overall hospitalization rates were also significantly lower (59.3%) in HFimpEF versus 85.19% in HFrEF (p < 0.05). Heart failure accounted for 50% of the cardiac-related hospitalizations. Mortality rates were reduced (14.8%) in the HFimpEF group compared with 29.63% in HFrEF, but there was no significant statistical difference between the groups. A lower brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is predictive of both improved EF (p < 0.01) and decreased mortality (p < 0.01). Conclusions Patients with myocardial recovery post-ICD/CRT have better prognoses than those with persistent HFrEF. Uncontrolled heart failure remains the predominant factor contributing to hospitalization after device implantation among our cohort. Implementing an outpatient standardized clinical interval summary that incorporates scheduled BNP assessment may represent a cost-effective strategy to enhance the care of patients with HFimpEF in non-tertiary healthcare.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management


