Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
The novel St Thomas' Hospital polarizing blood cardioplegia: results in hearts with reduced ejection fraction
Laurenz Wolner1,2, Petra Lujza Szabo1,2, Milat Inci1,2
1Center for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Insights
New polarizing cardioplegia (STH-pol) showed similar myocardial protection compared to traditional depolarized arrest (STH-control) in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction. Both methods provided comparable hemodynamic recovery and high-energy phosphate levels post-ischemia/reperfusion.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury
Background:
- Traditional depolarized cardioplegia, used for over 50 years, can lead to calcium overload, mitochondrial damage, and energy depletion in cardiac surgery patients.
- Older patients often have comorbidities, increasing the need for improved myocardial protection strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a novel polarizing cardioplegia (STH-pol) against standard depolarized cardioplegia (STH-control) in an ischemia/reperfusion model.
- To assess the efficacy of STH-pol in protecting the myocardium, particularly in hearts with reduced ejection fraction.
Main Methods:
- Myocardial infarction was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats via LAD artery ligation.
- Six weeks post-MI, hearts were isolated and subjected to 60 minutes of cold (4°C) ischemic arrest using either STH-pol or STH-control, followed by 45 minutes of reperfusion at 37°C.
- Hemodynamic variables and high-energy phosphate (HEP) levels were analyzed post-reperfusion.
Main Results:
- STH-pol demonstrated comparable hemodynamic recovery to STH-control, with similar left ventricular systolic pressures after ischemia.
- Analysis of high-energy phosphates, including ATP levels, showed no statistically significant difference between the STH-pol and STH-control groups.
- Both methods provided similar levels of myocardial protection in terms of energy metabolism.
Conclusions:
- Polarizing cardioplegic arrest (STH-pol) did not result in a statistically significant difference in myocardial protection compared to standard cold blood cardioplegia (STH-control).
- The findings suggest that STH-pol is a viable alternative to traditional methods in this specific experimental model.
- Further research may explore the long-term effects and clinical applicability of polarizing cardioplegia.
Objectives:
Myocardial protection is crucial for recovery after cardiac surgery. Despite older patients with more comorbidities, most surgeons still use potassium-induced depolarized arrest with cardioplegic solutions from more than 50 years ago. However, this can cause calcium overload, mitochondrial injury and energy depletion. We tested a new polarizing cardioplegia (STH-pol) versus traditional depolarized arrest (STH-control) in an ischaemia/reperfusion model of hearts with reduced ejection fraction.
Methods:
Myocardial infarction (MI) was induced by permanent ligation of the left anterior descending artery in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Six weeks post-MI, the hearts were isolated and perfused on an erythrocyte-perfused working heart system. Cold ischaemic arrest (4°C, 60 min) was induced by STH-pol (n = 10) or STH-control (n = 8), followed by reperfusion (37°C, 45 min). Haemodynamic variables were recorded throughout reperfusion, and tissue samples were taken at the end of reperfusion to analyse high-energy phosphates (HEP).
Results:
Administration of STH-pol resulted in comparable haemodynamic recovery after 60 min ischaemia as STH-control induced cardioplegic arrest (left ventricular systolic pressure: 109.1 ± 3.4 vs 103.3 ± 3.6). Similarly, HEP levels did not differ between the two groups (ATP: 2.5 ± 0.4 nmol/mg protein and 2.2 ± 0.9 nmol/mg).
Conclusions:
Polarizing cardioplegic arrest did not lead to a statistically significant difference in myocardial protection as compared to a clinically relevant, standard cold blood cardioplegia in rat hearts with chronic MI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy

