The novel St Thomas' Hospital polarizing blood cardioplegia: results in hearts with reduced ejection fraction

Laurenz Wolner1,2, Petra Lujza Szabo1,2, Milat Inci1,2

  • 1Center for Biomedical Research and Translational Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Insights

New polarizing cardioplegia (STH-pol) showed similar myocardial protection compared to traditional depolarized arrest (STH-control) in a rat model of chronic myocardial infarction. Both methods provided comparable hemodynamic recovery and high-energy phosphate levels post-ischemia/reperfusion.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Background:

  • Traditional depolarized cardioplegia, used for over 50 years, can lead to calcium overload, mitochondrial damage, and energy depletion in cardiac surgery patients.
  • Older patients often have comorbidities, increasing the need for improved myocardial protection strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel polarizing cardioplegia (STH-pol) against standard depolarized cardioplegia (STH-control) in an ischemia/reperfusion model.
  • To assess the efficacy of STH-pol in protecting the myocardium, particularly in hearts with reduced ejection fraction.

Main Methods:

  • Myocardial infarction was induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats via LAD artery ligation.
  • Six weeks post-MI, hearts were isolated and subjected to 60 minutes of cold (4°C) ischemic arrest using either STH-pol or STH-control, followed by 45 minutes of reperfusion at 37°C.
  • Hemodynamic variables and high-energy phosphate (HEP) levels were analyzed post-reperfusion.

Main Results:

  • STH-pol demonstrated comparable hemodynamic recovery to STH-control, with similar left ventricular systolic pressures after ischemia.
  • Analysis of high-energy phosphates, including ATP levels, showed no statistically significant difference between the STH-pol and STH-control groups.
  • Both methods provided similar levels of myocardial protection in terms of energy metabolism.

Conclusions:

  • Polarizing cardioplegic arrest (STH-pol) did not result in a statistically significant difference in myocardial protection compared to standard cold blood cardioplegia (STH-control).
  • The findings suggest that STH-pol is a viable alternative to traditional methods in this specific experimental model.
  • Further research may explore the long-term effects and clinical applicability of polarizing cardioplegia.
Abstract