Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Whole-Body Nanoparticle Aerosol Inhalation Exposures
Published on: May 7, 2013
Preventive effect of precautionary lowered exposure or adaptation of nanomaterial workers?
Daniela Pelclová1, Tomáš Navrátil1, Jaroslav Schwarz2
1Department of Occupational Medicine, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Objectives:
Nanotechnology is a fast-growing field in both science and industry. However, experimental studies brought warning data concerning the negative effect of engineered nanoparticle exposure leading to oxidative stress, inflammation, decreased immune cell viability, and genotoxicity. The consequences of human exposure may appear with decades of latency. Therefore, more data is needed to identify the hazardous effects of nanoparticles. Exposure should be under control and biomarkers of effect are urgently searched.
Methods:
Exposures of researchers working with nanocomposites were measured in yearly intervals for 5 years and biomarkers of oxidative stress and/or antioxidant capacity were analysed. Exposure to aerosols with nanoparticles was measured repeatedly using online and offline instruments during both the machining of geopolymer samples with epoxide resin and nanoSiO2 filler and metal surface welding. The levels of biomarkers of oxidation of lipids, nucleic acids and proteins were analysed in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) of researchers and controls in 2016-2018. In 2019 and 2020, glutathione was measured in plasma to assess their antioxidant status. The trends in both exposure and EBC biomarkers' levels were analysed.
Results:
On average, 21 researchers were examined yearly (aged 40 ± 5 years, exposure 14 ± 3 years). After 5 years, the mean mass concentration dropped from 0.921 to 0.563 mg/m3 and mean total number of particle concentrations from 146,106 to 17,621/cm3. The majority of biomarkers of oxidation of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids decreased (p < 0.05) during repeated measurements from the highest levels being mostly found in 2016. Glutathione in plasma in 2019-2020 was elevated (p < 0.01) as compared to controls.
Conclusions:
The adaptation of long-term exposed researchers may give a plausible explanation. However, to our meaning, the precautionary principle and higher attention of the employers to the potential risk of nanoparticles by reducing nanoparticles exposure by almost one order of magnitude played the key role.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Personal Protective Equipment
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...

