Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025
![Assessment of Gastric Emptying in Non-obese Diabetic Mice Using a [13C]-octanoic Acid Breath Test](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F50301.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Assessment of Gastric Emptying in Non-obese Diabetic Mice Using a [13C]-octanoic Acid Breath Test
Published on: March 23, 2013
Clinical Relevance of Gastric Emptying Time in Functional Dyspepsia
Hye Lim Park1, Jeongmin Lee2, Soo Jin Kwon1
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Background/Aims:
This study evaluates the clinical significance of the gastric emptying time (GET) in patients with functional dyspepsia (FD).
Methods:
This retrospective study included 89 patients who visited the clinic with indigestion between 2021 and 2022. FD was diagnosed and categorized into 3 subtypes: postprandial distress syndrome, epigastric pain syndrome, and overlap type, following the Rome IV criteria. GET was assessed using 99mTc scintigraphy. The stomach remnant was measured 1 and 2 hours after ingesting a technetium-99m labeled egg, and the time required for the remnant to decrease by half (T1/2) was calculated.
Results:
Of the 89 patients studied, 46 were diagnosed with FD. The remaining 43 patients, who did not meet the Rome IV criteria, were included as the control group. Patients with FD exhibited a higher incidence of smoking, a higher body mass index, and a higher incidence of diabetes than the non-FD group. GET and T1/2 did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (P = 0.240 and P = 0.126, respectively). However, the FD group exhibited a smaller gastric retention rate than the non-FD group at all time points. In the subtype analysis, GET and T1/2 were not significantly different among the 3 subtypes (P = 1.000 and P = 0.173, respectively). Diabetes mellitus, current smoking status, elevated body mass index, and younger age were significantly associated with FD.
Conclusion:
GET did not significantly differ among FD patients or its subtypes, despite a lower gastric retention rate in FD patients.
Related Concept Videos
Gastric Emptying
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Gastritis III: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical manifestations of acute gastritis
The patient with acute gastritis may have a rapid onset of symptoms, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, dyspepsia, anorexia, hiccups, or nausea and vomiting, which can last from a few hours to a few days. Erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis may cause bleeding, which may manifest as blood in vomit or as...
Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...

