Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.0K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.0K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.1K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.1K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.3K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.5K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.9K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

4.3K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
4.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Random Responding Detection in Two Alternative Forced Choice Tests: <i>l</i> <sub><i>z</i></sub> vs. Optimal Appropriateness Measurement.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

General formulae for transforming Pearson's r to the scale of Cohen's d.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

babebi: An R Package for Bayesian Estimation and Validation in Small-N Two-Rater Pre-Post Designs.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

A Tool for Agreement and Alignment Analysis in Binary Rating Tasks: The R Package scindex.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The EM Algorithm and Its Variants in Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Comparing Their Propensity for Boundaries, Extremes, Convergence, and Suboptimal Solutions.

Applied psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

When Perceptions of Social Desirability Differ: Implications for the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model of Faking.

Applied psychological measurement·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Standard Error Estimation for Subpopulation Non-invariance.

Paul A Jewsbury1

  • 1ETS Research Institute, ETS, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Applied Psychological Measurement
|July 8, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New methods accurately assess score linking fairness across subpopulations by accounting for linking error dependencies. This improves the detection of fairness issues in standardized testing.

Keywords:
bridgingequatinglinkingmodestandard errorsubpopulation invariance

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

918
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

918
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Score linking is crucial for comparing assessment scores across different scales or conditions.
  • Ensuring fairness requires the linking function to be invariant across diverse subpopulations.
  • Existing methods struggle to accurately evaluate subpopulation differences due to complex error dependencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate novel statistical methods for assessing score linking invariance across subpopulations.
  • To address the overestimation of standard errors in current approaches that ignore linking error dependencies.
  • To enhance the power of detecting fairness violations in educational and psychological assessments.

Main Methods:

  • Development of statistical models that explicitly incorporate linking error dependencies.
  • Simulation studies to evaluate the accuracy and performance of the proposed methods under various conditions.
  • Application of the new methods to a real-world dataset for practical validation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods provide accurate standard error estimates for subpopulation differences in linked scores.
  • Neglecting or misrepresenting linking error dependencies leads to substantial overestimation of standard errors.
  • The new approach significantly increases statistical power to detect non-invariance across subpopulations.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate accounting for linking error dependencies is essential for valid fairness evaluations in score linking.
  • The developed methods offer a more reliable approach to ensuring equity in standardized testing.
  • Improved standard error estimation facilitates more robust detection of fairness issues, supporting equitable assessment practices.