Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

11:35
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
58.2K
Performance of Composite Endpoints Defining Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis
Ludwig Kappos1, Sean Yiu2, Jason Reucassel2
1Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
|July 9, 2025
Summary
Composite progression independent of relapse activity (cPIRA) is a clinically relevant endpoint for multiple sclerosis trials. It predicts future disability and is useful for assessing treatment efficacy in relapsing MS.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Trials
- Multiple Sclerosis Research
Background:
- Composite progression independent of relapse activity (cPIRA) is an emerging endpoint in multiple sclerosis (MS) research.
- Evaluating cPIRA's characteristics and utility is crucial for refining clinical trial designs in relapsing MS (RMS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the characteristics and utility of cPIRA as a clinical trial endpoint in RMS.
- To investigate the impact of different cPIRA definitions and rebaselining strategies.
- To explore the relationship between cPIRA, biomarkers, and future clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the ENSEMBLE and pooled OPERA I/II studies in RMS patients.
- Evaluation of various cPIRA definitions and the effect of post-relapse rebaselining.
- Correlation of cPIRA events with MRI activity and serum neurofilament light (sNfL) levels.
- Assessment of cPIRA event sustainability and association with future disability progression (EDSS, SDMT, MSIS-29).
Main Results:
- Rebaselining was unnecessary for cPIRA in over 95% of ocrelizumab-treated patients due to low disease activity.
- cPIRA events were largely independent of MRI activity and associated with lower sNfL levels in ocrelizumab arms.
- Interferon β-1a treatment showed higher sustainability of cPIRA events compared to ocrelizumab.
- cPIRA was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent worsening on EDSS, SDMT, and MSIS-29 physical scale.
Conclusions:
- cPIRA demonstrates clinical relevance and utility as a sensitive endpoint in multiple sclerosis clinical trials.
- cPIRA can effectively capture disability progression independent of relapses, offering valuable insights into treatment effects.
- Further validation of cPIRA as a composite endpoint is warranted for its broader application in MS research.

