Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Sustainable diets and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Marina Kasper1, Mirna Al Masri2, Tilman Kühn3,4,5,6
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Background:
Sustainable diets are increasingly recommended as a strategy to reduce non-communicable diseases and promote planetary health. Current unhealthy dietary patterns are thought to contribute to the global cancer burden while food systems continue to exacerbate environmental challenges. Investigating the impact of sustainable diets on cancer is therefore critical.
Methods:
This systematic review and meta-analysis included observational studies of healthy adults at baseline, reporting cancer incidence or cancer mortality during follow-up. Eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive search of multiple databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 28, 2025. Sustainable diets were assessed using various metrics, and effect measures were pooled to compare adherence to sustainable dietary patterns. Summary effect estimates for cancer incidence and mortality were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were conducted for sex, geographic regions, study design, sustainability metrics, dietary assessment indices on sustainability, cancer types, and dietary energy intake adjustment. E-values were used to assess the robustness of associations against potential unmeasured confounding. The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42024545102).
Findings:
We pooled 19 effect estimates from 17 studies, identified through the literature search. These studies encompassed over 2·2 million participants, with studies spanning from 1983 to 2022. Adherence to sustainable diets revealed a significant reduction in cancer incidence (RE = 0·93 [95% CI 0·88-0·98], I2 = 84·67%) and cancer mortality (HR = 0·88; 95% CI 0·85-0·92, I2 = 21·25%). Subgroup analyses indicated that the overall effect was modified by study region and design, sustainability metrics and dietary assessment indices. High heterogeneity, risk of bias in some studies, and e-values indicating potential residual confounding resulted in an overall low level of evidence as evaluated using GRADE.
Interpretation:
These findings provide pooled evidence linking sustainable diets to reduced cancer incidence and mortality, highlighting their potential for cancer prevention and their dual health and environmental benefits. This analysis also revealed notable differences in sustainability metrics, emphasizing the need for standardized approaches.
Funding:
This research received no external funding.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Psychoneuroimmunology: Diabetes and Cancer
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

