Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
Published on: August 5, 2020
Evaluating implementation preparedness for suicide screening and referral in a Nepali emergency department: A
Anmol P Shrestha1, Roshana Shrestha1, Ajay Risal2
1Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Background:
Most research on appropriate, feasible, and effective suicide screening has excluded research conducted in non-Western and low-income settings. This study explores preparedness and co-designing a suicide screening and referral intervention in a Nepali emergency department (ED) using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Method:
To assess implementation readiness and context, we conducted eight key informant interviews and four focus-group discussions with clinical staff along with 3 months of embedded ethnography. We also assessed clinical staff (n = 26) knowledge, attitudes, current practices, confidence, and institutional priorities surrounding implementing suicide screening using structured questionnaires. Qualitative analysis used CFIR to assess feasibility, acceptability, and necessary implementation strategies for a suicide screening intervention within the context of this resource-strained ED. We report descriptive statistics of quantitative findings using a convergent analytic mixed-methods approach.
Results:
Qualitatively, clinicians expressed hopelessness and reservations surrounding ED programs to prevent suicide given important system and social barriers. Additionally, they doubted their ability to meaningfully overcome broader structural issues in their patients' lives (e.g., poverty and family tension) that they believed more directly determined suicidal behavior and thwarted help seeking. They discussed practical and emotional motivators for doing suicide prevention work, which highlighted departmental leadership and deep teamwork that motivated action despite wider societal myths that suicide cannot easily be prevented. Quantitative assessments largely supported these findings, indicating shared beliefs that suicide prevention was important and supported by leadership. However, providers frequently endorsed suicide myths and noted barriers including difficult interdepartmental collaboration, limited confidence in suicide prevention communication and suicide screening.
Conclusions:
In under-resourced settings, staff must contend with competing responsibilities and complex structural causes of suicide and barriers to treatment. These can impede implementation of suicide screening interventions and must be integrated into the co-design of implementation strategy selection and deployment.
Trial Registration:
NCT06094959 clinicaltrials.gov.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Ethical Dilemmas II
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Preventive Healthcare Services