Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

05:22
Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring
Published on: January 20, 2023
1.8K
Cryptic variation fuels plant phenotypic change through hierarchical epistasis
Sophia G Zebell1,2, Carlos Martí-Gómez1, Blaine Fitzgerald1,2
1Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Nature
|July 9, 2025
Summary
Cryptic genetic variants, when interacting, can drive trait evolution. This study reveals how gene networks and dosage effects in tomato inflorescences generate diverse phenotypes, from buffered traits to rapid evolutionary changes.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Evolutionary Biology
- Plant Biology
Background:
- Cryptic genetic variants are thought to fuel evolutionary change through interactions.
- Pan-genomics reveals extensive variation in regulatory regions and networks.
- Studying cryptic variation's role in phenotypic diversification is challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how cryptic genetic variants and gene regulatory networks influence phenotypic evolution.
- To explore the role of paralogous gene pairs and their interactions in shaping complex traits.
- To understand the mechanisms underlying phenotypic buffering and rapid evolutionary change.
Main Methods:
- Identified cis-regulatory cryptic variants and trans regulators in tomato paralogous genes.
- Constructed a gene regulatory network controlling inflorescence architecture.
- Generated 216 genotypes by combining coding and cis-regulatory mutations across four network genes.
- Quantified inflorescence branching in over 35,000 individuals.
- Analyzed genotype-phenotype data using a hierarchical epistasis model.
Main Results:
- Discovered dose-dependent interactions within paralogue pairs that enhance branching.
- Revealed synergistic effects from accumulating mutations within paralogue pairs.
- Identified antagonistic interactions between paralogue pairs, where mutations in one pair buffered effects in another.
- Demonstrated how gene regulatory network architecture and paralogue diversification shape phenotypic space.
Conclusions:
- Gene regulatory network structure and complex dosage effects from paralogue diversification are key drivers of phenotypic variation.
- These mechanisms allow for both stable, buffered phenotypes and rapid, significant phenotypic shifts.
- The study provides insights into the evolutionary potential stored within cryptic genetic variation.
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis
47.7K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
47.7K
Epistasis Analysis
5.2K
Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...
5.2K
Position-effect Variegation
6.6K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
6.6K
Incomplete Dominance
25.6K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
25.6K
Trihybrid Crosses
24.0K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
24.0K
Monohybrid Crosses
231.4K
Overview
231.4K

