Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
BSE@GW-based protocol for spin-vibronic quantum dynamics using the linear vibronic coupling model. Formulation and
Florian Bogdain1, Sebastian Mai2, Leticia González2,3
1Institute of Physics, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 23-24, 18059 Rostock, Germany. oliver.kuehn@uni-rostock.de.
Abstract:
A protocol for generating potential energy surfaces and performing photoinduced nonadiabatic multidimensional wave packet propagation is presented. The workflow starts with the parameterization of a linear vibronic coupling (LVC) Hamiltonian using the Green's function - Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE@GW) approach. In a second step, the LVC model is used as input for multi-layer multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree (ML-MCTDH) wave packet propagation. To facilitate automated ML tree generation, a spectral clustering algorithm is applied based on a correlation matrix obtained from nuclear coordinate expectation values of a full-dimensional time-dependent Hartree (TDH) simulation. The performance of the protocol is tested on the photoinduced spin-vibronic dynamics of a transition metal complex, [Fe(cpmp)]2+. For this example, it is shown that BSE@GW provides a more robust description of the character of the transitions contributing to the absorption spectrum compared to TD-DFT. Furthermore, the LVC parameterization is tested against explicit calculations of potential energy curves to find the validity of the linear approximation over a wide range of normal mode elongation. Finally, the flexibility of spectral clustering is used to generate different ML trees, resulting in very different numerical efficiencies for ML-MCTDH propagation. In terms of electronic structure and dimensionality, [Fe(cpmp)]2+ is a challenging example, suggesting that the new protocol should be applicable to a wide range of systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...

