Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025
06:09
Piezo High Accuracy Surgical Osteal Removal PHASOR: A Technique for Improved Cranial Window Surgery in Mice
Published on: March 2, 2018
10.8K
Piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction: A comparative study
Kuldeep Pal1, Swati Tiwari2, Sumit Patidar3
1Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Pal Hospital, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Bioinformation
|July 10, 2025
Summary
Piezoelectric surgery for impacted lower third molars offers better outcomes than traditional rotary methods. This technique reduces postoperative pain, swelling, and improves healing, enhancing patient satisfaction.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Background:
- Surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars is a common dental procedure.
- Traditional rotary instruments are widely used, but piezoelectric surgery offers a minimally invasive alternative.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical efficiency and postoperative outcomes of piezoelectric surgery versus conventional rotary techniques for impacted lower third molar extraction.
- To assess patient satisfaction between the two surgical methods.
Main Methods:
- The study evaluated surgical time and postoperative pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores.
- Swelling severity, trismus development, and healing rates were assessed over a 7-day period.
Main Results:
- Piezoelectric surgery, despite potentially longer surgical times, resulted in significantly reduced postoperative pain and swelling.
- Improved functional restoration and healing rates were observed in the piezoelectric group.
Conclusions:
- Piezoelectric surgery demonstrates superior postoperative outcomes compared to traditional rotary techniques for impacted lower third molar extraction.
- The benefits include decreased patient discomfort and enhanced recovery, suggesting its potential as a preferred method.
