Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

05:59
Author Spotlight: Unlocking New Insights in fNIRS Studies - A Novel Framework for Inter-Brain Synchrony Analysis
Published on: October 6, 2023
2.7K
Minimum-Phase Property of the Hemodynamic Response Function, and Implications for Granger Causality in fMRI
Leonardo Novelli1, Lionel Barnett2, Anil K Seth2,3
1School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Human Brain Mapping
|July 10, 2025
Summary
Granger causality (GC) analysis in neuroimaging is viable despite variations in the haemodynamic response function (HRF). However, initial dips in the HRF and slow BOLD signal sampling can still lead to spurious inferences.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Computational Neuroscience
- Biophysics
Background:
- Granger causality (GC) estimates directed statistical dependence in brain activity time series.
- Functional MRI (fMRI) uses the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, indirectly measuring neural activity.
- Variations in the haemodynamic response function (HRF) across brain regions may distort GC estimates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of HRF variations on Granger causality (GC) validity in fMRI.
- To determine if realistic biophysical models of the HRF satisfy the minimum-phase condition required for valid GC analysis.
- To identify conditions under which GC inferences in fMRI may be distorted.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of transfer functions for three realistic biophysical models of the HRF.
- Assessment of the minimum-phase condition across a range of physiologically plausible parameter values.
- Evaluation of the impact of BOLD signal sampling rates on GC inference.
Main Results:
- The minimum-phase condition for the HRF is met for a wide range of physiologically plausible parameters.
- Violation of the minimum-phase condition occurs with HRFs exhibiting an initial dip.
- Slow BOLD signal sampling (seconds) relative to neural timescales (milliseconds) can introduce spurious GC inferences.
Conclusions:
- Granger causality analysis is generally viable in fMRI even with HRF variability, provided the HRF is minimum-phase.
- Initial dips in the HRF and slow BOLD sampling are critical limitations to consider for accurate GC inference.
- Closed-form HRF transfer functions offer a balance of mathematical tractability and biological plausibility for fMRI time series modeling.

