Related Experiment Videos
Abdominal aortic aneurysm in Chinese patients
The British Journal of Surgery
|November 1, 1985
Summary
This study on abdominal aortic aneurysms found emergency surgery had a 33.3% mortality rate, significantly higher than elective surgery. Many patients with intact aneurysms did not undergo surgery due to unfitness or refusal.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Aortic Aneurysm Research
- Public Health
Background:
- Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) pose significant health risks.
- Surgical intervention is a primary treatment for AAA.
- Understanding outcomes and patient selection is crucial for AAA management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the outcomes of aneurysmectomy for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
- To compare operative mortality between elective and emergency AAA surgeries.
- To assess factors influencing surgical intervention rates in AAA patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 120 Chinese patients with infrarenal AAA from 1975-1983.
- Analysis of surgical outcomes for 72 patients who underwent aneurysmectomy.
- Categorization of surgeries into elective and emergency procedures.
Main Results:
- Operative mortality was 4.4% for elective aneurysmectomy and 33.3% for emergency cases.
- All 27 patients with ruptured AAA underwent surgery.
- Only 48.4% of patients with intact AAA received surgical treatment; 35 declined and 13 were unfit.
- Peptic ulcer disease was present in 26.4% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Emergency surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms carries a high mortality risk.
- Patient factors, including willingness and fitness, significantly impact surgical rates for intact AAA.
- High prevalence of comorbid conditions like peptic ulcer disease warrants consideration in AAA patient management.