Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Verification and Validation of Microcomputed Tomography-Based Analyses of Bone Morphology, Apparent Elastic Modulus,
Mahsa Zojaji1,2, Baixuan Yang1, Heidi-Lynn Ploeg1,2
1Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Smith Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V9, Canada; Centre for Health Innovation, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada.
Abstract:
Patient-specific image-based finite element analysis (FEA) offers a noninvasive method to estimate bone stiffness and strength, but its clinical translation requires thorough verification and validation. While previous studies provide resolution-dependent errors in trabecular bone morphometric indices, there remains a need to extend these analyses to include mechanical property predictions. This study examined microcomputed tomography (μCT) voxel size effects on trabecular bone morphometric analyses and predictions of apparent elastic modulus (Eapp) and trabecular stress. Voxel (v)- and geometry (g)-based FEA of trabecular bone cores under compression were compared. Convergence analyses were performed on element size and boundary conditions; and, bulk density, tissue density, and FEA were validated against experimental measurements. Trabecular bovine bone cores (n = 22, Ø10 mm × 10 mm) were tested quasi-statically under uni-axial compression below the yield limit, and μCT scanned with isotropic voxel sizes of 20 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm. Increasing voxel size resulted in significant reductions in connectivity density, anisotropy, and trabecular number, while trabecular thickness increased. Predicted Eapp from both v-FEA and g-FEA were highly correlated with measurements (R2 = 0.8, p < 0.001). A maximum mean error of +6.35% was found in Eapp with 100 μm voxel size. Despite its high computational cost (∼120 min), 20 μm v-FEA was the most accurate for predicting Eapp and trabecular stress. Alternatively, both 50 μm v-FEA and g-FEA at low mesh density (h = 0.0011, where h is 1/√number of elements) predicted both Eapp and trabecular stress behavior with less than ±5% error in 10-20 min. Findings support efficient, accurate FEA strategies for predicting trabecular bone mechanics.
Related Concept Videos
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Castigliano's Theorem
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...

