Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Updated Network Meta-Analysis of First-Line Systemic Treatments for Advanced HCC: Consistent Role of TACE
Ye Rim Kim1, Euichang Kim1, Ha Il Kim2
1Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background And Aims:
We conducted an updated network meta-analysis to evaluate and identify the optimal first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among all relevant interventional and targeted therapies.
Methods:
We analyzed 16 phase 2 or 3 randomized controlled trials involving 9,482 patients with metastatic or unresectable HCC published between 2018 and 2024. The trials evaluated 11 systemic agents and 5 interventional treatments in combination with systemic therapy, using either sorafenib or lenvatinib as the control. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and grade 3-4 adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess individual treatment efficacies in specific clinical settings.
Results:
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib provided the greatest improvement in OS over sorafenib, with a hazard ratio of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.58), followed by sintilimab + IBI305 (0.57; 0.43-0.75), camrelizumab + rivoceranib (0.62; 0.48-0.80), atezolizumab + bevacizumab (0.66; 0.51-0.85), lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (0.77; 0.62-0.97), and tremelimumab + durvalumab (0.78; 0.64-0.95). These combinations, except for tremelimumab + durvalumab, also showed significantly superior PFS to sorafenib. TACE + lenvatinib was ranked first in OS analyses with the other current standard-of-care regimens (lenvatinib, atezolizumab + bevacizumab, and tremelimumab + durvalumab) as controls. TACE + lenvatinib, sintilimab + IBI305, and atezolizumab + bevacizumab demonstrated consistently significant extension of OS over sorafenib in subsets with portal invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and hepatitis B. All immunotherapy-based combinations were significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse events than sorafenib.
Conclusions:
For advanced HCC, our first-line analysis consistently scored TACE + lenvatinib the best for survival outcomes, followed by various immunotherapy-based combinations. However, the superior efficacy of TACE + lenvatinib should be interpreted with consideration of its derivation from a region with high hepatitis B virus prevalence.
Insights
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib offers the best survival outcomes for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immunotherapy combinations also show promise, but TACE + lenvatinib
Area of Science:
- Hepatology and Oncology
- Clinical Trials and Network Meta-Analysis
Background:
- Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requires effective first-line treatments.
- Evaluating novel interventional and targeted therapies is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the optimal first-line treatment for advanced HCC.
- To compare interventional and targeted therapies using network meta-analysis.
Main Methods:
- Network meta-analysis of 16 phase 2/3 randomized controlled trials (2018-2024).
- Involved 9,482 patients with metastatic or unresectable HCC.
- Evaluated 11 systemic agents and 5 interventional combinations against sorafenib/lenvatinib, focusing on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Main Results:
- Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + lenvatinib demonstrated the greatest OS improvement (HR 0.41).
- Several immunotherapy combinations (sintilimab + IBI305, camrelizumab + rivoceranib, atezolizumab + bevacizumab) also showed significant OS and PFS benefits.
- TACE + lenvatinib, sintilimab + IBI305, and atezolizumab + bevacizumab were effective across specific patient subsets (portal invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, hepatitis B).
Conclusions:
- TACE + lenvatinib is the leading first-line treatment for advanced HCC based on survival outcomes.
- Immunotherapy-based combinations represent viable alternatives.
- The efficacy of TACE + lenvatinib may be influenced by regional hepatitis B virus prevalence.
More Related Videos
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
12:24A Three-Dimensional Spheroid Model to Investigate the Tumor-Stromal Interaction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: September 30, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Tumor Immunotherapy