Development and validation of machine learning-based survival analysis to predict outcome in gastric cancer with
Yan Pan1, Linbin Lu1,2, Xianchun Gao1
1State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Objective:
The previously integrated tumor-inflammation-nutrition (HI-GC) score has demonstrated dynamic monitoring value for recurrence and clinical decision-making in patients with postsurgical gastric cancer (GC). However, its failure to incorporate clinical-pathological factors limits its capacity for baseline risk assessment. This study aimed to develop a model that accurately identifies patients for adjuvant chemotherapy and dynamically evaluates recurrence risk.
Methods:
This retrospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study, spanning nine hospitals, included 7,085 patients with GC post-radical gastrectomy. A baseline prognostic model was constructed using 117 machine-learning algorithms. The dynamic survival decision tree model (dySDT) was employed to combine the baseline model with the HI-GC score.
Results:
A Cox regression model incorporating six factors was used to create a nomogram [Harrell's C-index: training cohort: 0.765; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.747, 0.783; validation set: 0.810; 95% CI: 0.747, 0.783], including pT stage, positive lymph node ratio, pN stage, tumor size, age, and adjuvant chemotherapy. The best-performing machine learning model exhibited similar predictive accuracy to the nomogram (C-index: 0.770). For the short-term dySDT at 1 month, the mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for groups IIa, IIb, and III were 2.61 (95% CI: 2.24, 3.04), 5.02 (95% CI: 4.15, 6.06), and 8.88 (95% CI: 7.57, 10.42), respectively, compared to group I. Stratified analysis revealed a significant interaction between adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival in each subgroup (P<0.001). The long-term dySDT at 1 year showed HRs of 3.25 (95% CI: 2.12, 4.97) for group II, 6.73 (95% CI: 4.29, 10.56) for group IIIa, and 17.88 (95% CI: 10.71, 29.84) for group IIIb.
Conclusions:
The dySDT effectively stratifies mortality risk and provides valuable assistance in clinical decision-making after gastrectomy.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
