Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Extracellular Matrix01:42

The Extracellular Matrix

84.1K
Overview
84.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A new flow chip in combination with multiphoton microscopy as a protocol for longitudinal 3D imaging of tissue calcification under shear stress.

FEBS open bio·2026
Same author

Fiber-Reinforced Printing (FiRePrint) - a novel method for the production of load-oriented 3D scaffolds in biohybrid implants.

Biofabrication·2026
Same author

Evaluation of tissue-engineered blood vessels as three-dimensional in vitro testing system in cardiovascular research.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Adversarial robustness of LLM-based multi-agent systems for engineering problems.

Frontiers in artificial intelligence·2026
Same author

Modelling inflammatory endothelial dysfunction: a human in vitro platform for translational research.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Generation of a human vascularized 3D airway model replicating native mucosal heterogeneity.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to Organotypic 3D Cellular Models Mimicking the Epithelio-Ectomesenchymal Bilayer During Odontogenesis.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
Same journal

A Novel 3D Bioprinting Strategy for Bioengineering of Urethra with Clinical Relevance.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
Same journal

Hydrogel-Encapsulated Primed MSCs Enhance Regeneration in Full-Thickness Porcine Burn Wounds.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
Same journal

Unidirectional Porous Carbonate Apatite Fabricated by Gelatin-Based Freeze Casting for Bone Regeneration.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
Same journal

Regenerative Nanoscaffolds for Chronic Tympanic Membrane Perforation: From Bench to Clinical Translation.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
Same journal

Impact of IFN-γ-Pretreated Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells Implanted in Mesh on Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Microfluidic Model to Mimic Initial Event of Neovascularization
10:01

Microfluidic Model to Mimic Initial Event of Neovascularization

Published on: April 10, 2021

4.8K

In Vitro Model Extracellular Matrix Maturation Under Variable Stress Conditions.

Christian A Boehm1, Mahmoud Sesa2, Vytautas Kucikas3

  • 1Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles (BioTex), AME Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Tissue Engineering. Part A
|July 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scaffold reinforcement enhances tissue implant elasticity, while nonreinforced scaffolds promote extracellular matrix (ECM) production. An in silico model aids scaffold design, but requires further validation for accurate mechanical property prediction.

Keywords:
ECM formationECM orientationdynamic cultivationfiber reinforcementmodel-based design

More Related Videos

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture
10:54

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture

Published on: January 17, 2017

11.8K
2.5D Model for Ex Vivo Mechanical Characterization of Sprouting Angiogenesis in Living Tissue
10:00

2.5D Model for Ex Vivo Mechanical Characterization of Sprouting Angiogenesis in Living Tissue

Published on: February 28, 2025

472

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Microfluidic Model to Mimic Initial Event of Neovascularization
10:01

Microfluidic Model to Mimic Initial Event of Neovascularization

Published on: April 10, 2021

4.8K
Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture
10:54

Tunable Hydrogels from Pulmonary Extracellular Matrix for 3D Cell Culture

Published on: January 17, 2017

11.8K
2.5D Model for Ex Vivo Mechanical Characterization of Sprouting Angiogenesis in Living Tissue
10:00

2.5D Model for Ex Vivo Mechanical Characterization of Sprouting Angiogenesis in Living Tissue

Published on: February 28, 2025

472

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Optimizing tissue-engineered implant design is crucial for clinical success.
  • Understanding the interplay between scaffold properties and cultivation conditions is key for extracellular matrix (ECM) development.
  • In silico models offer potential for accelerating the design and development of tissue-engineered constructs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of scaffold reinforcement and cultivation conditions on ECM development in tissue-engineered implants.
  • To test the hypothesis that mechanical stress influences ECM production and alignment.
  • To explore the utility of an in silico growth model in conjunction with in vitro findings.

Main Methods:

  • Fabrication of fiber-reinforced and nonreinforced scaffolds using warp-knitted textiles and fibrin gel.
  • Cultivation of myofibroblasts within scaffolds under static and dynamic conditions.
  • Assessment of ECM development via mechanical testing, hydroxyproline assays, microscopy, and an in silico growth model.

Main Results:

  • Static cultivation promoted significant ECM development, with nonreinforced scaffolds showing greater collagen content and alignment.
  • Dynamic cultivation appeared to inhibit ECM formation, possibly due to cross-contraction and washout.
  • Fiber-reinforced scaffolds demonstrated superior elasticity and durability under cyclic stress, while nonreinforced scaffolds yielded higher ECM production but were structurally fragile.

Conclusions:

  • Fiber-reinforced scaffolds are suitable for load-bearing applications due to maintained geometry and elasticity.
  • Nonreinforced scaffolds support greater ECM production but require strategies to mitigate structural damage.
  • Optimized cultivation protocols, potentially including prestatic phases, are necessary for dynamic culture conditions.
  • A combined in vitro and in silico approach provides a framework for efficient scaffold design, reducing experimental iterations.