Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of peripheral nerve damage on promoting maladaptive plasticity in the spinal cord and brain.

Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Changes in muscle activation and joint motion during walking after transtibial amputation with sensory feedback from spinal cord stimulation: a case study.

Journal of neural engineering·2025
Same author

Characterizing spinal reflexes evoked by sensory spinal cord stimulation in people with lower-limb amputation.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

(Un)supervised (Co)adaptation via Incremental Learning for Myoelectric Control: Motivation, Review, and Future Directions.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2025
Same author

A Novel Template-Matching Method for Extracting Gait Cycles from Underfoot Pressure Data.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2025
Same author

Neural Network Sparsity in Brain-Body-Machine Interfaces.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 16, 2025

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.8K

Comparative Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning Methods to Learn General Value Functions of Lower-Limb Signals.

Sonny T Jones, Grange M Simpson, Wyatt M J Young

    IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [Proceedings]
    |July 11, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study compared temporal difference learning methods for predicting sensor signals in lower-limb exoskeletons. SwiftTD offered faster convergence, while TOTD showed lower errors, guiding algorithm selection for adaptive mobility devices.

    More Related Videos

    Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
    08:04

    Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

    Published on: August 23, 2017

    8.4K
    A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
    07:28

    A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

    Published on: August 2, 2016

    7.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Sep 16, 2025

    Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
    11:18

    Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

    Published on: June 1, 2015

    10.8K
    Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation
    08:04

    Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

    Published on: August 23, 2017

    8.4K
    A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli
    07:28

    A Method for Evaluating Timeliness and Accuracy of Volitional Motor Responses to Vibrotactile Stimuli

    Published on: August 2, 2016

    7.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Robotics
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Millions face paralysis, impacting motor function and mobility.
    • Current exoskeletons lack real-time adaptation to user biomechanics and environments.
    • Reinforcement learning can enhance exoskeleton effectiveness for rehabilitation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate temporal difference (TD) learning methods for predicting lower-limb sensor signals.
    • To compare the speed and accuracy of TD($\lambda$), TOTD, and SwiftTD algorithms.
    • To inform the selection of predictive algorithms for adaptive exoskeletons.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized temporal difference learning algorithms: TD($\lambda$), TOTD, and SwiftTD.
    • Predicted sensor data including electromyography (muscle activation), underfoot pressure, and joint angles.
    • Assessed algorithm performance based on convergence speed and error rates.

    Main Results:

    • SwiftTD demonstrated faster convergence across various sensor signals.
    • TOTD generally achieved lower convergence errors compared to other methods.
    • Algorithm performance varied depending on the specific signal being predicted.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of TD learning algorithm impacts prediction accuracy and speed for exoskeleton control.
    • Informed algorithm selection is crucial for developing adaptive, machine learning-controlled assistive devices.
    • Optimized predictive algorithms will enhance exoskeleton performance, improving mobility for individuals with paralysis.