Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.4K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.4K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

189
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
189
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.4K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.4K
Bias01:22

Bias

4.8K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

280
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
280
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

173
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
173

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Moral philosophy has much more to offer.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Editorial: The Psychology of Pseudoscience.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The ethics of explantation.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Who should be tested in a pandemic? Ethical considerations.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2020
Same author

Options to Reform the European Union Legislation on GMOs: Post-authorization and Beyond.

Trends in biotechnology·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.0K

Trialability.

Sven Ove Hansson1

  • 1Division of Philosophy, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Teknikringen 76, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|July 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Directly action-guiding experiments, like agricultural field trials, were more common in traditional farming than medicine. This study introduces a framework to analyze this difference in "trialability," the ease of finding and verifying interventions.

Keywords:
Clinical trialsDirectly action-guiding experimentsField trialsTrialability

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

21.0K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Methodology of Science
  • History of Science
  • Agricultural Science
  • Medical History

Background:

  • Directly action-guiding experiments (trials) assess intervention effectiveness, with clinical and agricultural trials as key examples.
  • These experiments have historical roots in various crafts and farming practices predating modern science.
  • Trialability, the ease of finding and verifying interventions for a desired outcome, is a crucial concept.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel framework for analyzing trialability across eleven distinct dimensions.
  • To compare the trialability of desired outcomes in traditional agriculture versus traditional (prescientific) medicine.
  • To explore how differences in trialability might explain historical adoption rates of action-guiding experiments.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a conceptual framework to dissect trialability into eleven measurable dimensions.
  • Comparative analysis applying this framework to historical practices in agriculture and medicine.
  • Qualitative assessment of intervention discovery and verification processes in both domains.

Main Results:

  • The study's framework reveals significant differences in trialability between traditional agriculture and medicine.
  • Trialability was found to be greater in several key respects within traditional agricultural practices compared to traditional medicine.
  • Specific dimensions contributing to higher trialability in agriculture were identified.

Conclusions:

  • The higher trialability in traditional agriculture provides a potential explanation for its earlier and more widespread use of directly action-guiding experiments.
  • Understanding trialability dimensions can offer insights into the historical development and adoption of experimental methodologies across different fields.
  • This framework can be applied to analyze trialability in contemporary practices and guide future research design.